Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Zoology and wildlife conservation

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Zoology and wildlife conservation

MPs challenge rejection of genetics panel

Article Abstract:

The House of Commons' Science and Technology Committee is very disappointed over the UK government's rejection of its proposal to found a Human Genetics Commission to regulate discoveries in human genetics and their social applications. The government believes that advisory committees and statutory bodies such as the Health and Safety Executive can safely address genetics issues. Various groups in the UK are critical over the government's decision, saying that the proposal would have been the perfect opportunity to eliminate misuse of genetics in areas of insurance and employment.

Author: Dickson, David
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 1996
Laws, regulations and rules, Genetic engineering, United Kingdom. Parliament. House of Commons

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Use of fetal eggs in research to be debated

Article Abstract:

A debate in the UK over the use of fetal eggs in embryo research and infertility treatments is on the horizon as scientist are starting to find applicable uses for the eggs. Because doctors may soon be able to transplant fetal ovaries as a infertility treatment, the Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority has announced that it will seek public opinion on the matter. Ethical issues arising from the use of fetal eggs include the child's right to know its biological grandmother and the rights of the man involved in creating the fetus over his germ-tissue line.

Author: Dickson, David
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 1993
Research, Fetus, Ethical aspects, Human reproductive technology, Fetal tissue transplantation

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


'Extra costs' force UK to terminate bid to privatize astronomy facilities

Article Abstract:

Extra costs that would be incurred in providing for pension commitments has forced the UK government to abandon its efforts to privatize the national observatories. Substantial legal costs have already been incurred from the operating funds of particle physics and astronomy research council, causing heavy burden on the financially ailing research council. The government is criticized over the prior options review policy, since the review process is motivated by financial considerations than by a concern for science.

Author: Dickson, David
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 1996
Economic aspects, Mergers, acquisitions and divestments, Privatization, Privatization (Business), Astronomical observatories

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United Kingdom, Science and technology policy
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Contribution of anthropogenic and natural sources to atmospheric methane variability. Recent patterns and mechanisms of carbon exchange by terrestrial ecosystems
  • Abstracts: Functional dissection of TFIIN domains required for TFIIb-TFIID-promoter complex formation and basal transcription activity
  • Abstracts: Extraordinary preservation in a new vertebrate assemblage from the Late Cretaceous of Mongolia. Flightless bird from the Cretaceous of Mongolia
  • Abstracts: Hypoxia-mediated selection of cells with diminished apoptotic potential in solid tumours. p53 is required for radiation-induced apoptosis in mouse thymocytes
  • Abstracts: Britain to support aerospace. UK debates public's role in science advice. Biosafety code gathers pace through bilateral agreements
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.