Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Zoology and wildlife conservation

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Zoology and wildlife conservation

US to rule on research patent

Article Abstract:

A natural phenomenon or a law of nature generally could not be patented, but the Supreme Court provided an opportunity for the biotechnology industry when it ruled that a newly discovered microbe capable of digesting petrol could be patented. The Supreme Court heard a case where LabCorp argued that Metabolite had patented a law of nature by asserting ownership of the relationship between homocysteine levels and vitamin B(sub 12).

Author: Ruttimann, Jacqueline
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 2006
Science & research, Research, Interpretation and construction, Microorganisms, Natural law

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Patent reform prompts intellectual tug-of-war

Article Abstract:

The reform of patent process in the US is shaping up as a battle of wills between the software and biotechnology industries, which mostly relies heavily on intellectual property. The two draft bills under consideration draw heavily from recommendations made by the National Academy of Sciences, the Federal Trade Commission and the US Patent and Trademark Office and has several provisions that have broad support.

Author: Marris, Emma
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 2005
Prepackaged software, Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities, Patent Law, Computer software industry, Software industry, United States. Patent and Trademark Office

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Should conservation biologists push policies?

Article Abstract:

Conservation biologists are facing a tough question of whether they should restrict themselves to just describing the facts of a case or whether they should tell people what measures should be taken. Although some experts do not support the combination of science and advocacy, a majority believe that conservation biologists should advocate certain policies.

Author: Marris, Emma
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 2006
Legal issues & crime, Government regulation (cont), Government regulation, Administration of Air and Water Resource and Solid Waste Management Programs, Legal/Government Regulation, Environmental Programs, Administration of Environmental Quality Programs, Resources, Environ & Energy-Total Govt, Laws, regulations and rules, Beliefs, opinions and attitudes, Powers and duties, Environmental policy, Nature conservation, Ecologists

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Biotechnology industry, Biotechnology industries, Intellectual property
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Nuclear deal riles India's researchers. Indian regulations fail to monitor growing stem-cell use in clinics
  • Abstracts: Steady progress: Better budgets for biologists. Clinical precision
  • Abstracts: Mining the secrets of the egg. Conservation at a distance: A gentle way to age
  • Abstracts: Advisers knock Katrina health tests. DNA tests put death penalty under fire. Ethics review slams government panels over conflicts of interest
  • Abstracts: Ministers agree to act on warnings of soaring temperatures in Africa. All eyes on Addis
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.