| Civil Engineering 2006 Michael C. Loulakis |
| Title | Subject | Authors |
|---|
| Commercial impracticability: "difficult to prove." | Science and technology | Michael C. Loulakis, Lauren P. McLaughlin |
| Conditions precedent nullify contractor's claim.(TA Operating Corporation and Solar Applications Engineering, Inc. seek appeal court decision) | Science and technology | Michael C. Loulakis, Lauren P. McLaughlin |
| Lack of notice nullifies award of delay damages.(Dugan and Meyer Construction Co., Inc. v. State of Ohio) | Science and technology | Michael C. Loulakis, Lauren P. McLaughlin |
| Proving a 'constructive acceleration' claim.(Robust Construction LLC; Army Corps of Enginee) | Science and technology | Michael C. Loulakis, Lauren P. McLaughlin |
| State's affidavit of merit statute may not apply to architect acting as construction engineer. | Science and technology | Michael C. Loulakis, Lauren P. McLaughlin |
| Suit against design professionals dismissed for lack of privity. | Science and technology | Michael C. Loulakis, Lauren P. McLaughlin |
| The duty to preserve evidence during remediation work.(Harborview Office Center v. Camosy, Inc.)(Case overview) | Science and technology | Michael C. Loulakis, Lauren P. McLaughlin |
| Will sealing plans create a cause of action for negligence? | Science and technology | Michael C. Loulakis, Lauren P. McLaughlin |
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
