The National Law Journal 1995 Daniel Riesel - Abstracts
The National Law Journal 1995 Daniel Riesel | |||||
Title | Subject | Authors | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
House bills on regulation and takings, passed as planks of Contract With America, leave a litany of issues for the courts. | Law | David Sive, Daniel Riesel | |||
In the majority of environmental cases brought recently, courts have held that individual plaintiffs do have standing to sue. | Law | David Sive, Daniel Riesel | |||
Self-critical analysis and other evidentiary privileges may fail to protect the confidentiality of routine environmental audits. (part 1) | Law | David Sive, Daniel Riesel | |||
The Contract with America's proposed moratorium on rule-making would open up a Pandora's box of issues for litigation. (part 1) | Law | David Sive, Daniel Riesel | |||
The EPA and some state legislatures weigh strengthening the self-critical analysis privilege so as to promote candor in audits. (part 2) | Law | David Sive, Daniel Riesel |
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.