Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society 2003 - Abstracts

Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society 2003
TitleSubjectAuthors
"Are we certifiable?" Redux - a strategic plan for maintaining patent practice competence.LawSlate, William B., Carlson, Dale L., Vacchiano, Carolyn J.
Back to the future: rethinking the product of nature doctrine as a barrier to biotechology patents.(part 1)LawConley, John M., Makowski, Roberte
Chickens, eggs and other impediments to escalating reliance on dictionaries in patent claim construction.LawHattenbach, Ben
Discordant aspects of harmonization.(of patent laws)LawBanner, Donald W.
"Do-over!" - the Federal Circuit takes a second look at Enzo v. Gen-Probe.LawWoessner, Warren D.
Electronic user-friendly patent filing vision.LawSchneck, Thomas
Eli Lilly v. Barr Labs: is a new use of an old compound no longer patentable?LawJuneau, Todd, Goldberg, Joshua
In defense of the misunderstood provisional application.LawSlate, William B.
Inherency in patent law.LawFeit, Irving N., Warrick, Christina L.
In search of "ordinary meaning".(standard for interpreting patent claims)LawBarney, James R.
Must a patent describe an accused infringement?LawHarmon, Robert L.
Notable court decisions affecting PTO trademark practice.(Patent and Trademark Office)LawSamuels, Jeffrey M., Samuels, Linda B.
Patenting and ethics - a dubious connection.LawCrespi, R. Stephen
Piercing the language veil - transparency in patent applications.LawMeller, Michael N.
Post-grant review of patents: enhancing quality of the fuel of interest.LawMossinghoff, Gerald J., Kuo, Vivian S.
The judicial errors that brought us to FESTO.LawKlein, Alan P.
The U.S. first-to-invent system, the Mossinghoff conclusion, ...and statistics.(response to Gerald Mossinghoff in IPFrontline on IP Newsletter, vol. 6, no. 16, May 22, 2002)LawWhite, James E.
U.S. continuity law and its impact on the comparative patenting rates of the US, Japan and the European Patent Office.(response to Cecil D. Quillen, Jr. and Ogden H. Webster, Federal Circuit Bar Journal, vol. 11, p. 1, 2002)LawClarke, Robert A.
What does "evidence presented to rebut a prima facie case of obviousness must be commensurate in scope with the claims to which it pertains" mean?LawPitlick, Harris A.
What's good for the goose is good for the gander: an argument for the consistent interpretation of the Patent and Copyright Clause.LawLorengo, J.A.
Written description after Enzo Biochem: can the real requirement step forward please?LawBostyn, Sven J.R.
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.