Philosophy of the Social Sciences 2001 - Abstracts

Philosophy of the Social Sciences 2001
TitleSubjectAuthors
A defense of Darwinian accounts of morality.Social sciencesLemos, John
A disturbance of psychoanalytic memory: the case of John Rickman's three-person psychology.Social sciencesHanly, Charles, Nichols, Christopher
"Agency" as a red herring in social theory.Social sciencesLoyal, Steven, Barnes, Barry
Agents and norms in the new economics of science.Social sciencesDownes, Stephen M.
Between social science and social technology: toward a philosophical foundation for post-communist transformation studies.Social sciencesPickel, Andreas
Complexity theories, social theory, and the question of social complexity.Social sciencesStewart, Peter
Explanatory unification: double and doubtful.Social sciencesMaki, Uskali
Hacking's reconciliation: putting the biological and sociological together in the explanation of mental illness.(Special Issue: Papers from the Second St. Louis Roundtable on Philosophy of the Social Sciences, April 2000, part 2)Social sciencesMurphy, Dominic
Interpretation and epistemic evaluation in Goldman's descriptive epistemology.(Alvin Goldman)(Special Issue: Papers from the Second St. Louis Roundtable on Philosophy of the Social Sciences, April 2000, part 2)Social sciencesBeebe, James R.
Jacobs, equal opportunity, and 'The Bell Curve': a critique.(Lesley Jacobs, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, vol. 29, p. 121, 1999)Social sciencesKeita, L.D.
Methodological triangulation in nursing research.(Special Issue: Papers from the Second St. Louis Roundtable on Philosophy of the Social Sciences, April 2000, Part 1)Social sciencesRisjord, Mark, Moloney, Margaret, Dunbar, Sandra
On going native: Thomas Kuhn and anthropological method.Social sciencesTresch, John
On the limits of sociological theory.Social sciencesMartin, John Levi
Participatory Action Research: should social inquiry be conducted democratically?(Special Issue: Papers from the Second St. Louis Roundtable on Philosophy of the Social Sciences, April 2000, Part 1)Social sciencesKrimerman, Leonard
Reply to Keita.(article by L.D. Keita in this issue, p. 386, on the Bell Curve and heredity)Social sciencesLevin, Michael, Hocutt, Max
Reply to Professor Gross.(Alan G. Gross, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, vol. 30, p. 445, 2000)Social sciencesAgassi, Joseph
Research ethics and the interpretive stance in fieldwork.(response to T. Jones, Philosophy of the Social Science, vol. 28, p. 32, 1998)Social sciencesHerrera, C.D.
Rewriting color.(response to D. Dedrick, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, vol. 28, p. 179, 1998)Social sciencesSaunders, B.A.C., Van Brakel, J.
Sexual harassment and wrongful communication.Social sciencesWall, Edmund
Sociological not political: Rawls and the reconstructive social sciences.(Special Issue: Papers from the Second St. Louis Roundtable on Philosophy of the Social Sciences, April 2000, Part 1)Social sciencesKelly, Terrence
Systems and emergence, rationality and imprecision, free-wheeling and evidence, science and ideology: social science and its philosophy according to van den Berg.(response to review of 'Social Science Under Debate' by Axel van den Berg, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, vol. 31, p. 83, 2001)Social sciencesBunge, Mario
The Bell Curve and heredity: a reply to Hocutt and Levin.(Max Hocutt and Michael Levin, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, vol. 29, p. 389, 1999)Social sciencesKeita, L.D.
The problem of race in medicine.(Special Issue: Papers from the Second St. Louis Roundtable on Philosophy of the Social Sciences, April 2000, Part 1)Social sciencesRoot, Michael
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.