| Uniform Commercial Code Law Journal 1998 |
| Title | Subject | Authors |
|---|
| A comparison of a security agreement under the current Article 9 and the draft new Article 9.(Uniform Commercial Code) | Law | Weise, Steven O. |
| A preliminary comparison of the new Article 9 and the current Article 9. (Uniform Commercial Code)(Illustration) | Law | Weise, Steven O. |
| Revisiting Neth's 'The first to file priority in Article 9: can you sell your place in line?' and Shanker's response.(response to Spencer Neth and Morris Shanker, Uniform Commercial Code Law Journal, vol. 31, p. 64 and to Morris Shanker, Uniform Commercial Code Law Journal, vol. 31, p. 64, 82, 1998) | Law | Walt, Steven |
| Section 2-207 - "battle of the forms" revisited - "knock out" rule reaffirmed - "Roto-Lith" overruled. | Law | Del Duca, Louis F., Del Duca, Frances H. |
| Section 2-719 - limitation of damages - exclusivity of remedy inferred. | Law | Del Duca, Louis F., Del Duca, Frances H. |
| Sections 2-102, 2-202 - mixed sale - service transaction; sales parol evidence rule not applicable to service part of the transaction. (Mississippi) | Law | Del Duca, Louis F., Del Duca, Frances H. |
| Sections 9-306(2), 9-203(3), 2-236(2) - automatic contribution of security interest in identifiable proceeds; rights of consignee's creditors against consignor. (California) | Law | Del Duca, Louis F., Del Duca, Frances H. |
| Supreme Court adopts replacement cost method of valuing collateral for Chapter 13 cram down purposes. | Law | Resnick, Alan N. |
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
