Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Business, general

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Business, general

Antitrust talks founder on Microsoft's 'Desktop': Justice Dept. bargaining never really started

Article Abstract:

Antitrust negotiations between Microsoft and the Justice Department and 20 state Attorneys General did not collapse, as a consensus showed that they never really began. The two-day round of talks only reinforced both sides's definitions of the information-age economy. Discussions had resumed after Microsoft seemed ready to negotiate its dominance of the desktop, averting an expected lawsuit on May 14, 1998. The Government considers this position as crucial from an antitrust standpoint. Not only can the desktop serve as a gateway to the exploding Internet, but additional freedom for PC makers to customize their screens could challenge the Microsoft monopoly. Government officials involved with the discussions said Microsoft then reversed itself after talks resumed on May 15, refusing to permit significant desktop changes. Microsoft, which said it was considering concessions for PC manufacturers, claimed its desktop represents intellectual property that belongs to the company.

Author: Lohr, Steve, Brinkley, Joel
Publisher: The New York Times Company
Publication Name: The New York Times
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0362-4331
Year: 1998
Laws, regulations and rules, Market domination, Market share, Government Regulation

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Microsoft digs in against a 'poorly informed' U.S.; software giant says its antitrust stand is a matter of principle

Article Abstract:

Microsoft hardened its stance against the US Department of Justices' antitrust case against the company by stating that it is impossible to meet the government's latest demand. The government has demanded that Microsoft offer a version of Windows with only the browser removed and with all other functionality in tact. Microsoft said that poorly informed lawyers do not understand software design. Microsoft's latest stand follows a series of court actions on the antitrust case. On Dec 11, 1997, Federal Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson issued a preliminary injunction requiring Microsoft to offer computer makers the option of including only Windows without the Internet Explorer. In response, the company offered three alternatives, which were tantamount to saying that vendors should take Windows and the browser together or be willing to take an outdated OS. The Department of Justice filed a motion to hold Microsoft in contempt of the court.

Author: Lohr, Steve
Publisher: The New York Times Company
Publication Name: The New York Times
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0362-4331
Year: 1997
Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities, Dept of Justice, JUSTICE, PUBLIC ORDER, AND SAFETY, Usage, Company legal issue, Operating system, Operating systems (Software), Operating systems, Microsoft Windows 95 (Operating system)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Justice Department views Microsoft from both sides

Article Abstract:

Microsoft and the U.S. Department of Justice are involved in two separate cases, one in which the computer software company and the federal agency are on opposite sides of the case and one in which they are on the same side. The first case is the Justice Department's lawsuit to stop Microsoft from acquiring Intuit, the maker of Quicken personal finance software. The other case is the long-running dispute over a consent decree between Microsoft and the Justice Department which is opposed by a federal court judge and would prohibit certain anti-competitive practices. Analysts say that the two cases are different both on legal and on economic grounds. One case deals with monopolistic practices while the other deals with merger law. Economically, Microsoft is using two different methods to try and retain or improve its hold on the computer software industry.

Author: Bradsher, Keith
Publisher: The New York Times Company
Publication Name: The New York Times
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0362-4331
Year: 1995
Industry legal issue

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Computer software industry, Software industry, Software, Cases, Microsoft Corp., Antitrust law, United States. Department of Justice, MSFT, Litigation, Lawsuit/litigation, Antitrust Issue
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Microsoft, Justice Department appeal judge's ruling on antitrust accord. U.S. may appeal judge's ruling on Microsoft; Justic Department leans to fighting rejection of antitrust settlement
  • Abstracts: Adobe stock plunges 23% after report of loss. Microsoft says earnings outdo expectations
  • Abstracts: Microsoft manages to post record quarterly earnings. Higher results are reported by Microsoft; earnings again top analysts' estimates
  • Abstracts: US West plans two classes of stock, splitting phone holdings, new ventures. WorldCom reaches pact to buy MFS in $14.4 billion stock deal; transaction creates a powerful player in telephone sector
  • Abstracts: Intel admits it overstated chips' speed; skewing data is called common in the industry. Where the chips may fall next; as U.S. manufacturers enjoy the PC boom, Asia plans for the next big market
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.