Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Business, general

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Business, general

Bill easing curb on Baby Bells clears a hurdle

Article Abstract:

The Senate Commerce Committee approves legislation that would allow Bell telephone companies to manufacture telecommunications equipment. Manufacturing has been ruled out since the Bell system's breakup. The committee's vote is criticized by consumer groups and by AT&T. Opponents say that Bell companies might compete unfairly, which could result in higher phone rates. The committee's chairman, Ernest F. Hollings (D, SC), argues that lifting restrictions on Bell companies will encourage them to invest in US manufacturing at a time when the domestic telecommunications equipment industry is threatened by global competition. Representative Edward Markey (D, MA), chairman of the House Telecommunications and Finance subcommittee, wants a broader proposal that would impose safeguards on the Bell companies, to prevent anti-competitive behavior, if even more restrictions are removed.

Author: Carnevale, Mary Lu
Publisher: Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Publication Name: The Wall Street Journal Western Edition
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0193-2241
Year: 1991
Markey, Edward J., United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, Hollings, Ernest F., United States. Congress. House. Subcommittee on Telecommunications

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Baby Bells get Senate's nod to make gear

Article Abstract:

The Senate votes 71-24 to allow regional Bell telephone companies to manufacture telecommunications equipment. Bell companies are prevented from manufacturing equipment or providing long-distance services under provisions of the 1984 breakup of AT&T. If restrictions on manufacturing are lifted, Bell companies could become competitors to their former parent, AT&T, and to other big equipment companies. AT&T, telecommunications equipment companies, consumer groups and some state regulators are opposed to the proposed legislation, fearing unfair competition by the Bells. The Administration opposes the bill because of a 'domestic content' provision in it which would require that much of any assembly and manufacturing be done inside the US. The legislation now goes to the House. Considerable resistance is expected there.

Author: Carnevale, Mary Lu
Publisher: Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Publication Name: The Wall Street Journal Western Edition
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0193-2241
Year: 1991
United States. Congress. Senate

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA



Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules, Telecommunications services industry, Telecommunications industry, Telephone companies, Telecommunications equipment industry, Telecommunications equipment, Science and technology policy, Deregulation, Regional Bell Operating Companies, Legislative process, Communications Equipment, Telephone Company, Government Regulation, Legislation, Bell Regional Holding Companies
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: IBM to start announcing its fall line. IBM announces minicomputer line with more power. IBM to unveil some models of AS/400 line
  • Abstracts: IBM pension plan changes are expected to entice thousands of workers to retire. IBM launches retirement plan to cut outlays
  • Abstracts: AT&T will change backup-power plan as a result of pressure from customers. Mistake causes another AT&T outage, cutting off most service in New England
  • Abstracts: Phone concerns remain on path of slow growth; baby Bells, GTE expected to post modest gains for second quarter
  • Abstracts: AT&T mirrors MCI's service for collect calls. AT&T plays a new card in its strategy
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.