Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Business, general

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Business, general

Cutthroat cooperation: Asymmetrical adaptation to changes in team reward structures

Article Abstract:

A theory of structural adaptation based on 'asymmetric adaptability' is developed in order to explore the social interdependence theory dynamically and it is indicated that it is more difficult to for teams to shift from competitive to cooperative reward structures. Results show that teams that switch from competitive to cooperative reward structures demonstrate cutthroat cooperation in their performance, marked by lower team decision accuracy and higher speed.

Author: Hollenbeck, John R., Johnson, Michael D., Ilgen, Daniel R., Humphrey, Stephen E., Jundt, Dustin, Meyer, Christopher J.
Publisher: Academy of Management
Publication Name: Academy of Management Journal
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0001-4273
Year: 2006
Employee incentives

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Cooperation, competition, and team performance: Toward a contingency approach

Article Abstract:

A study involving seventy-five people in four-person teams examined whether the relationship between reward structure and team performance is dependent upon task dimension, team composition, and individual performance level. The results revealed that reward structure had more impact on team members with low performances.

Author: Hollenbeck, John R., Beersma, Bianca, Moon, Henry
Publisher: Academy of Management
Publication Name: Academy of Management Journal
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0001-4273
Year: 2003

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Asymmetric adaptability: Dynamic team structures as one-way streets

Article Abstract:

A study was conducted to test whether teams working on a command and control simulation adapted to structural change in the manner implied by contingency theories. Teams shifting from a functional to a divisional structure showed better performance than teams making a divisional-to-functional shift.

Author: Hollenbeck, John R., Ilgen, Daniel R., Moon, Henry, Humphrey, Stephen E., West, Bradley
Publisher: Academy of Management
Publication Name: Academy of Management Journal
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0001-4273
Year: 2004
Organizational structure

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Analysis, Influence, Work groups, Teamwork (Workplace), Employee performance, United States
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Equities: Australian stock exchange. Who has the ruler? Fed up with deflation threat: despite indications of uncertainty, it is difficult to believe on the evidence that the US economy faces a sustained period of deflation
  • Abstracts: Equities: Australian stock exchange. ASX prey to global rivals
  • Abstracts: Adler, with seed money, ponders capital ideas. Crescent changes the rules. Same again for Brierley
  • Abstracts: A question of balance. The year ahead. On drought rations. All companies can learn from the daunting cost-cutting choices that face drought-hit businesses
  • Abstracts: Lunch lingerers are no longer legends. Explaining a restructure. The best short breaks
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.