Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Business, general

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Business, general

Electronic brainstorming and group size

Article Abstract:

Two concurrent experiments were conducted with groups of varying size: there were 2-, 4-, and 6-person groups in one and 6- and 12-person groups in the other. We compared the number and quality of unique ideas generated by groups of each size using electronic and nonelectronic, verbal brainstorming. Groups used both techniques in a counterbalanced within-group design. The larger groups in both experiments generated more unique ideas and more high-quality ideas, and members were more satisfied when they used electronic brainstorming than when they used verbal brainstorming. There were fewer differences between the two techniques for the smaller groups in each experiment. We interpret these results as showing that electronic brainstorming reduces the effects of production blocking and evaluation apprehension on group performance, particularly for large groups. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)

Author: Valacich, Joseph S., Cooper, William H., Gallupe, R. Brent, Bastianutti, Lana M., Dennis, Alan R., Nunamaker, Jay F., Jr.
Publisher: Academy of Management
Publication Name: Academy of Management Journal
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0001-4273
Year: 1992
Forums (Discussion and debate)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


A study of policy formation in complex organizations: emulating group decision-making with simple artificial intelligence and a system model of corporate operations

Article Abstract:

A brain-body analogy is used to view the interaction of the policy-making and corporate systems of an organization. In this behavioral model, the policy-making system (brain) is modeled as an artificial intelligence (AI) with sociopolitical rules that mimic the logic of decision makers. Using this AI model, a simple shared cause-effect map for selecting policy options is created. The disastrous policies of sample firms are then reviewed using this AI model to examine operations of the corporate system (body). Results show that internal conflict is the principal cause of paradoxial behavior.

Author: Hall, Roger I.
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Journal of Business Research
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0148-2963
Year: 1999
Electronic computers, Electronic Computer Manufacturing, Artificial Intelligence Systems, Management Policy & Goals, Management, Artificial intelligence, Strategic planning (Business), Organizational behavior, Goal setting

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Punctuated equilibrium and linear progression: toward a new understanding of group development

Article Abstract:

This teamwork development study found that the punctuated equilibrium and integrative group development models are not at odds with one another.

Author: Chang, Artemis, Bordia, Prashant, Duck, Julie
Publisher: Academy of Management
Publication Name: Academy of Management Journal
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0001-4273
Year: 2003
Work groups, Teamwork (Workplace)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Research, Decision-making, Group, Group decision making, Models
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: CEO compensation and corporate performance. Implementing quality and re-engineering programmes: managing the people issues
  • Abstracts: Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry: toward a theoretical integration. Competition: is it all it's cracked up to be?
  • Abstracts: Organization and competitiveness - towards a new perspective. Success under fire: policies to prosper in hostile times
  • Abstracts: Research and Consultancy: Towards a Conceptual Synthesis. Knowledge levels and their transformation: towards the integration of knowledge creation and individual learning
  • Abstracts: The Capital Asset Pricing Model and Strategic Planning: Response to Wernerfelt. Influence activities and strategic coordination: two distinctions of internal and external markets
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.