Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Business, general

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Business, general

Insurers sum up the risks

Article Abstract:

The negotiations over the alliance between AMP Ltd. and its insurance subsidiary GIO Australia will have to proceed without an agreement to transfer $9.9 billion of superannuation funds and other investments to AMP Asset Management. AMP said it could save $70 million a year from an alliance, including the transfer of funds. The GIO board felt giving AMP full access to its distribution network would diminish the value of an important asset. Alliance negotiations are difficult because GIO is a listed subsidiary and a competitor with AMP.

Author: Kavanagh, John
Publisher: B R W Media
Publication Name: Business Review Weekly
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0727-758X
Year: 1999
Insurance, Insurance Carriers and Related Activities, INSURANCE CARRIERS, Management, Insurance industry, Practice, Corporate governance, Negotiation, mediation and arbitration, GIO Australia, AMP, Batchelor, Paul, Mazoudier, Paul, Corrigan, Peter

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Change is on the cards

Article Abstract:

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has accused the National Australia Bank of behaving uncompetitively in respect of its credit and debit card schemes. The banks are charged with fixing fees. The case being heard in the Australian courts is likely to lead to changes in how the system operates.

Author: Kavanagh, John
Publisher: B R W Media
Publication Name: Business Review Weekly
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0727-758X
Year: 2000
Banking Institutions, Depository Credit Intermediation, Bank Credit Cards, DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS, Cases, Banks (Finance), Unfair competition (Commerce), Unfair competition, Credit and debit card industry, Credit card industry, Australia. Competition and Consumer Commission

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Westpac has robbed us, says angry shareholder

Article Abstract:

An angry shareholder writes a letter to Westpac Banking Corp. stating that the 1999 unfranked dividends caused shareholders to lose imputation credits worth $250 million. These credits would have been taxable and could have possibly left shareholders with a net amount of an additional $175 million.

Author: Kavanagh, John
Publisher: B R W Media
Publication Name: Business Review Weekly
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0727-758X
Year: 1999
Securities, Westpac Banking Corp., WBK

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Statistical Data Included, Banking industry, Commercial banks, Australia
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Ford deals with it: the car company's retail adventure has not been a success, with slow sales and dealer hostility
  • Abstracts: Banks tighten the credit squeeze. ANZ, Westpac steal march. NAB grabs the biggest slice of the custody market
  • Abstracts: Costello applies a gloss to the picture. Costello in the wings and ready to fly. Costello's growth challenge
  • Abstracts: Island schemes raided. Tax raid guessing game. ATO verdict: not guilty, not innocent
  • Abstracts: No partners, so it's more fun wth the family. A genuine town and country outfit. Capital-city services at out-of-town prices
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.