Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Business, general

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Business, general

Japan electronics suppliers withheld parts from U.S. industry, GAO finds

Article Abstract:

The US General Accounting Office (GAO) releases its report that supports allegations by US electronics companies complaining about Japanese suppliers that discriminate against them, withholding critical parts. When this happens, the companies say, the same parts are available to Japanese companies. The GAO's report indicates that 22 of 59 US companies questioned give specific examples of rejected orders or delayed deliveries. Products or parts that are withheld or delayed include semiconductor manufacturing devices, such as optical steppers, and computer parts, such as screens or memories. Many US companies, however, do not experience these sorts of problems, and many say they do not believe that such withholding practices violate US law. Many say that the US should make it a national policy to minimize US dependence on Japan in areas that involve critical technologies. Japanese suppliers interviewed by the GAO deny that they do anything wrong.

Author: Lachica, Eduardo
Publisher: Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Publication Name: The Wall Street Journal Western Edition
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0193-2241
Year: 1991
ELECTRONIC & OTHER ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT, General government, not elsewhere classified, Reports, Supply and demand, International aspects, Electronics industry, Free trade, United States. Government Accountability Office, Investigations, Electronic Industry, Industry Analysis, Supply, United States. General Accounting Office, Investigation

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Chip-making pioneer in U.S. found grief in Seiko joint venture; Micro Power's John Hall says his loss of the firm shows dangers in Japanese deals; charges of poor management

Article Abstract:

US semiconductor industry executive John Hall, formerly of Micro Power Systems Inc, a joint venture with Seiko, will settle with the Japanese company over what he believes was a wrongful termination. Seiko, a partner in Micro Power, will pay Hall a fraction of the $110 million that he sought. Some consider Hall's experience a cautionary tale about doing business with high-tech foreign companies. Others believe that Hall mismanaged Micro Power and deserved the ouster. Hall says problems in the relationship with Seiko began in 1986, 15 years after he started the company. He wanted to go public with the company; Seiko balked at the idea and fired him. Hall spent the next three years and his own money fighting the termination. Hall's advice to potential entrepreneurs is to be mindful of differing personalities when lining up investors. If one cannot get along with potential partners, find others.

Author: Lachica, Eduardo
Publisher: Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Publication Name: The Wall Street Journal Western Edition
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0193-2241
Year: 1990
Management, Joint ventures, Partnerships, Hall, John, Company Profile, Joint Venture, Mismanagement, Cooperative Agreements, Court Cases, Foreign Investment, Hattori Seiko Company Ltd., Partnership, Micro Power Systems Inc.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA



Subjects list: United States, Semiconductor industry, Japan, Japanese foreign relations, United States foreign relations, International competition (Economics), Japanese Competition
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Electric utility (West) industry. part 2 Electric utility (west) industry
  • Abstracts: Telecommunications services industry. part 2
  • Abstracts: Auto parts industry. Machinery industry
  • Abstracts: Electrical equipment industry. part 3
  • Abstracts: Office equipment & supplies industry. part 2
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.