Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Business, general

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Business, general

Judge says Intel doesn't hold right to '386' name

Article Abstract:

In what is seen as a small defeat for Intel Corp in its ongoing legal battles with Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) over copyright issues, a federal judge ruled that Intel does not own trademark rights to the term '386'. AMD has developed a reverse-engineered clone microprocessor that mimics the popular Intel 80386 and plans to release it as the Am386. Intel filed a copyright suit a year ago after learning of AMD's product. The judge ruled that Intel failed to prove that the number 386 is not generic. Microcomputer manufacturers increasingly use the term 386 in their product titles. The suit was a vital one for AMD because, if the ruling had gone in Intel's favor, vendors would have been prevented from using the numbers although they had utilized the Am386 microprocessor. The big legal battle is yet to come though, as Intel also claims that the AMD product is based on specific proprietary Intel microcode.

Author: Yoder, Stephen Kreider
Publisher: Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Publication Name: The Wall Street Journal Western Edition
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0193-2241
Year: 1991
Copyright, Copyrights, Intellectual property, Trademarks, Patents, Patent/Copyright Issue, Legal Issues, Court Cases, Intel 80386 (Microprocessor), Trademark

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Advanced Micro Devices charges Intel in anti-trust suit seeking $2 billion

Article Abstract:

Advanced Micro Devices Inc (AMD) sues Intel Corp for $2 billion in damages and injunctive relief over Intel's alleged anti-competitive practices in the semiconductor market. The antitrust suit against Intel comes soon after the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) began investigating Intel for unfair business practices. The suit charges that Intel has monopolized the microprocessor market. Some industry observers say that AMD's charges have some substance. AMD has gained the right to manufacture Intel microprocessor clones, but many microcomputer manufacturers are hesitant to use AMD products, fearing reprisals from Intel.

Author: Yoder, Stephen Kreider
Publisher: Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Publication Name: The Wall Street Journal Western Edition
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0193-2241
Year: 1991
Computer peripheral equipment, not elsewhere classified, Antitrust law, Market share, Competition, Antitrust Laws, Lawsuits, Domination

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA



Subjects list: Semiconductor industry, Cases, Intel Corp., INTC, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., AMD
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Intel plans to add 30 new versions of microprocessors. Advanced Micro seeks a chip off its own block
  • Abstracts: Apple licenses system to Radius, slashes prices for on-line service. Adobe achieves partial victory in software war; Apple sets licensing pact with PostScript maker after spurning it in '89
  • Abstracts: Unisys nears sale of defense unit to reduce debt. Moody's mulls downgrading debt of IBM
  • Abstracts: AT&T laser chips conduct heat via synthetic diamond. AT&T to unveil alliances creating a global network
  • Abstracts: The outlook; high tech is forming a role as an indicator. Silicon Volley; high-tech firms rush to fund a pet cause: chill all the lawyers; a former Intuit ace leads California battle to curb law suits and huge fees; finding rewards in politics
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.