Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Business, general

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Business, general

Microsoft files denials in antitrust suit; in another pretrial salvo, Government seeks deposition by Gates

Article Abstract:

Microsoft formally blasted the Government's antitrust case against it, saying the sweeping suit filed by the Justice Department and 20 states in May 1998 lacks merit. The first court papers filed by Microsoft also indicate part of its legal strategy for the Federal District Court trial scheduled to start on Sep 8, 1998, in Washington. The Government, meanwhile, is seeking a videotaped pretrial deposition from Microsoft Chmn and co-Founder William H. Gates, according to an attorney insider. Microsoft denied any wrongdoing in all of the key Government allegations. An example is the bundling of its browsing software and OS, which Microsoft said it has planned as early as late 1993 and early 1994. By that time, Netscape Communications had yet to be founded. Microsoft defended the development of its Internet Explorer browser and inclusion of browsing capabilities in its Windows 95 OS. The company also rejected Government claims of attempting to seize the browser market with Netscape.

Author: Lohr, Steve
Publisher: The New York Times Company
Publication Name: The New York Times
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0362-4331
Year: 1998
Operating system, Operating systems, Web browser, Web browsers, Litigation, Lawsuit/litigation, Microsoft Internet Explorer (Web browser), Microsoft Windows 95 (Operating system)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Microsoft fires first salvo in antitrust fight with U.S.; software maker seeks 7 months to prepare

Article Abstract:

Microsoft asked US District Court Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson to schedule a hearing in Dec 1998, so it can prepare for antitrust suits filed against the software maker by the Justice Dept and 20 state Attorneys General. By comparison, Justice will ask Jackson to begin by Jul 1998, accusing Microsoft of attempting to delay the case and let a rapidly evolving software industry render the legal issues moot. The differences are rooted in the Government's request for a preliminary injunction that would force Microsoft either to remove its Internet Explorer Web browser from its Windows 98 OS or add Netscape's Navigator browser on Windows 98. The Government also seeks to give PC manufacturers more latitude in modifying Windows 98. Legal experts did not reach a consensus in predicting Jackson's timetable, but few believed Microsoft would receive a seven-month delay.

Author: Lohr, Steve
Publisher: The New York Times Company
Publication Name: The New York Times
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0362-4331
Year: 1998

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA



Subjects list: Computer software industry, Software industry, Company legal issue, Cases, Microsoft Corp., Operating systems (Software), Antitrust law, MSFT, Internet access software, United States. Department of Justice. Antitrust Division, Antitrust Issue
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Microsoft voices confidence it can grow in face of changes. Microsoft and the Web: making critical mass pay. Microsoft tops expectations with 52% rise in net income
  • Abstracts: The needs of R&D professionals in their first and second managerial appointments: are they being met? Quality measurement as a basis for resource allocation: research assessment exercises in United Kingdom universities
  • Abstracts: Creating lean suppliers: diffusing lean production throughout the supply chain. Developing co-operative buyer-supplier relationships: a case study of Toyota
  • Abstracts: Microsoft, Justice Department face off, but hearing ends without a decision. Microsoft gets quick hearing on bundling
  • Abstracts: The two grown-ups behind Yahoo's surge. Netscape jolts Web by allying with Excite Inc. The gatekeeper
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.