Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Business, general

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Business, general

Ten questions and answers on managing MIS projects

Article Abstract:

More than a thousand computer executives were surveyed for a study of project management in management information systems (MIS). The study determined the significance of the project team, including questions regarding the extent and type of team, distribution of effort and authority, pros and cons of using teams, and roles of managers and team leaders. This analysis provides more practical information for MIS managers deciding on the use of project teams and a comparison for those already utilizing them.

Author: Ford, Robert C., McLaughlin, Frank S.
Publisher: Project Management Institute
Publication Name: Project Management Journal
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 8756-9728
Year: 1992
Surveys, Work groups, Teamwork (Workplace)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


A comparative analysis of two concept evaluation methods for new product development projects

Article Abstract:

The Ulrich and Eppinger methodology, a two-stage, structured concept selection methodology, is more effective than the Pugh approach when dealing with concepts that require further consideration in a less disruptive way. Such advantage can be attributed to the method's use of a ranking system which makes comparison of slightly different concepts more direct. The Pugh approach, on the other hand, offers greater support in the creation of alternative concepts during the evaluation process.

Author: Carland, James W., Pascale, Steven, Carland, JoAnn C.
Publisher: Project Management Institute
Publication Name: Project Management Journal
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 8756-9728
Year: 1997
Product Development, Management Functions, Management, Management research

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Using project teams to create MIS products: a life cycle analysis

Article Abstract:

The classical management theory that there should be parity of authority and responsibility in project management across different stages of the life cycle is tested using data gathered from 462 information system managers. Results indicate that such parity does not exist, but the responsibility of management information system groups frequently increases as the life cycle progresses.

Author: Ford, Robert C., McLaughlin, Frank S.
Publisher: Project Management Institute
Publication Name: Project Management Journal
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 8756-9728
Year: 1993
Product life cycle, Matrix organization

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Research, Project management, Management information systems, Analysis
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Stock option plans make sense. Managing health care costs: flex-plans. Making child care an employee benefit
  • Abstracts: Financial managers: Business Advocates or Corporate Cops? Telephone industry develops new cost standards
  • Abstracts: Brand management. Advertising content when brand choice is a signal
  • Abstracts: U.S. threatens stiff tariffs on EC goods. U.S. sets tariffs on steel imports
  • Abstracts: Modelling construction change order management. Risk behavior of contractors: a Canadian study. Organizational engineering principles in project management
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.