Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Business, general

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Business, general

The adoption of the multidivisional form of organization: a contingency model

Article Abstract:

This article examines the proposition that the multidivisional structure is determined by both power and efficiency imperatives. It is theorized that combining the coalitional power and information-processing perspectives of organizational choice enables us to explain and predict organizational form. The theory is tested on 291 Fortune 500 firms. The results largely confirm theoretical expectations. It is submitted that the multidivisional paradigm illustrates the central premises of the article: (1) a synthesis of efficiency and power perspectives is a viable research programme; and (2) theoretical pluralism increases empirical content and should be valued by those concerned with progress in the emerging field of strategic management. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)

Author: Mahoney, Joseph T.
Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Publication Name: Journal of Management Studies
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0022-2380
Year: 1992
Research, Business planning, Organizational behavior, Decentralization (Management)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Strategic management and determinism: sustaining the conversation

Article Abstract:

This article suggests that strategy research should concern itself with continuing the conversation of the field rather thsn insisting upon a place for universal methodological criteria within that conversation. It attempts to sustain the dialogue begun by Bourgeois, Bowman, Jemison, Huff, and others, who recommend the pragmatic approach of methodological and theoretical pluralism as the best way forward in increasing empirical content. The article draws heavily on the philosophical writings of Dewey, Kaplan, and Rorty and the methodological essays of economists such as Boland, Caldwell, and McCloskey in an effort to persuade others in the strategy field that 'good science is good conversation'. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)

Author: Mahoney, Joseph T.
Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Publication Name: Journal of Management Studies
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0022-2380
Year: 1993
Beliefs, opinions and attitudes, Determinism, Determinism (Philosophy)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Edith Penrose's (1959) Contributions to the Resource-based View of Strategic Management

Article Abstract:

The authors demonstrate how Edith Penrose has directly influenced the present-day perspective of resource-based strategic management. Topics include creating and sustaining competitive advantage, economic rents, and isolating mechanisms.

Author: Mahoney, Joseph T., Kor, Yasemin Y.
Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Publication Name: Journal of Management Studies
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0022-2380
Year: 2004
Methods, Management, Influence, Comparative analysis, Resource allocation, Comparative advantage (Commerce), Comparative advantage, Penrose, Edith

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Analysis, Strategic planning (Business)
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Predicting participation and production outcomes through a two-dimensional model of organizational commitment
  • Abstracts: The electronic back fence: e-mail isn't just for corporations anymore. PC survey winner from J.D. Power has cause to crow
  • Abstracts: Decreasing organizational size: untangling the effects of money and people. The stigma of bankruptcy: spoiled organizational image and its management
  • Abstracts: The handicap that wasn't. Costs for firms set a record. There's no place like Home Depot
  • Abstracts: Peer reporting of unethical behavior: social context perspective. Rational and social theories as complementary explanations of communication media choices: two policy-capturing studies
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.