Whistleblowing and the professional: the common response to whistle blowers is retaliation

Article Abstract:

Employees' fear of reprisals from their organizations and from coworkers for whistleblowing acts can be alleviated by managers through efforts to reinforce awareness of the existence of provisions that will provide whistleblowers with sufficient protection within the organization. Managers can encourage the reporting of fraudulent and corrupt practices by cultivating an organizational communication climate that is supportive of the act of whistleblowing. It is important that the organization minimize its defensiveness regarding the issue to establish an environment of trust. The responses of managers and other executives to a 1988 survey on the practice of whistleblowing sheds light on the importance of trust in eliciting more favorable responses regarding organizational practices of whistleblowing and eliminating the fear of reprisal and retaliation.

Whistle blowing, Whistleblowing

---

Ghosts of Christmas future

Article Abstract:

The Business Ethics Study Team, Inc, affiliated with New York University's Stern School of Business, has shown that an effective technique for instilling business students with respect for high ethical conduct in their professional lives and a fear of the consequences of failing to adhere to high ethical standards is asking business professionals convicted of white-collar crimes to share their stories with the students. The small-time, white-collar criminals may ignore the risks of prosecution and punishment because they do not deeply appreciate the devastating effects that being caught will have on their career and lives. The consequences of being caught can include: the loss of reputation; negative social and psychological effects on the criminal's family; and the permanent effects of imprisonment.

Analysis, Study and teaching, Business ethics, White collar crimes, White collar crime, New York University. Leonard N. Stern School of Business, Business Ethics Study Team

---

The high cost of corporate crime

Article Abstract:

The severe sentencing guidelines regarding corporate crime proposed by the Sentencing Commission have recently been enacted into law. The new guidelines limit the exercise of judicial discretion and imposes a stringent and obligatory fine schedule on companies found guilty of committing federal crimes, including fraud and antitrust offenses. One way for a company to reduce its exposure to legal risks is developing a program for the prevention and detection of violations of law. This program should conform to the Sentencing Commission guidelines, which would require certain steps to be taken, such as communicating compliance standards and procedures to all organizational members, enforcing compliance standards consistently, and making high-ranking personnel responsible for the program.

Laws, regulations and rules, Criminal liability of juristic persons, Juristic persons criminal liability, United States. Sentencing Commission

Similar abstracts:

• Abstracts: Converting to for-profit status: corporate responsiveness to radical change. Matching individual career plans and organizational career management
• Abstracts: Stock answer; buying and trading securities on the Web could revolutionize the relationship between investors and brokerage firms
• Abstracts: Corporate political strategy and foreign competition: the case of the steel industry. Leaders, followers, and free riders: an empirical test of variation in corporate political involvement
• Abstracts: Integrating justice constructs into the turnover process: a test of a referent cognitions model. Contextual variables in employee performance-turnover relationships
• Abstracts: Standards of ethical conduct for management accountants. Task Force for Quality in Financial Management

This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.