Comment on 'the economics of tobacco advertising: spending, demand, and the effects of bans'

Article Abstract:

Comments on the paper by Lancaster and Lancaster on the relationship between tobacco advertising, advertising bans, consumption, are presented. It is concluded that full or partial bans on advertising are likely to have little or no effect on aggregate cigarette or tobacco demand.

---

A reply to the comment of Franke and Andrews on 'the economics of tobacco advertising: spending, demand and the effects of bans'

Article Abstract:

Justifications that supplement the original study put forward by Lancaster and Lancaster in response to the criticism by Franke and Andrews are presented. Some key aspects of several published studies along with the advertising and ban coefficients are highlighted.

---

The economics of tobacco advertising: spending, demand, and the effects of bans

Article Abstract:

This paper presents research evidence to show that consumption of tobacco products is not dependent upon the amount of advertising or lack thereof. This statement applies to both adults and children throughout the world.

Science & research, World, Public affairs, Social aspects, Research

Similar abstracts:

• Abstracts: Child poverty and government policy: the case of the UK. Government revenues, budgets and general elections. Section 5: public finance: taxes, transfers and the distribution of income: UK experience 1997-2001
• Abstracts: Chevron to increase capital spending 35% in 2006. BP expects strong profit gain on high prices
• Abstracts: Within-country diversity: is it the key to South Africa's prosperity in a changing world? An international review of sponsorship research: extension and update

This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.