Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Business, international

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Business, international

Review and accounts 1992

Article Abstract:

The Royal Town Planning Institute increased its membership to 17,000 members in 1992 and spent much of the year in reviewing its current role, and developing both current and new activities. These activities included discussions with government ministers regarding planning policy, liaising with members of parliament, commitment to equal opportunities policies, reviewing professional standards and introducing a number of training programmes under the auspices of the Planning and Environmental Training division of RTPI Services Ltd.

Publisher: Royal Town Planning Institute (UK)
Publication Name: Planner
Subject: Business, international
ISSN: 0309-1384
Year: 1993
Reports, United Kingdom. Royal Town Planning Institute

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


DIY review

Article Abstract:

The UK's do-it-yourself (DIY) market amounted to 7.24 billion pounds sterling in 1997, up 19% from 1992. The one significant factor affecting the market is the position of the housing market, which has greatly improved during the period. The main sectors in the market are home decoration products, DIY tools and ironmongery, building materials and self-assembly furniture. The market for DIY products, at current prices, is forecast to grow from 7.42 billion pounds sterling in 1997 to 8.90 billion pounds sterling in 2001.

Publisher: Mintel International Group Ltd.
Publication Name: Leisure Intelligence (Mintel)
Subject: Business, international
ISSN:
Year: 1997
Do-It-Yourself Building Materials (Ret, Home Centers, Lumber and other building materials, Retail Sales, United Kingdom, Building materials industry, Home center stores, Do-it-yourself products industry

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Shameful: peer review

Article Abstract:

Women scientists face greater discrimination than men when it comes to being published or receiving postdoctoral fellowships. An analysis of peer review board decisions from Sweden demonstrates this, as well as a bias against the science competence of women.

Publisher: Economist Newspaper Ltd.
Publication Name: The Economist (UK)
Subject: Business, international
ISSN: 0013-0613
Year: 1997
Evaluation, Sex discrimination, Women scientists, Peer review

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Analysis
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Activity-based costing: accounting for a market orientation. M&A activity in branded food and drink
  • Abstracts: True-loves and truants. No palace like home in Prague. No one loves like a mom
  • Abstracts: Roman and Regency on the river. River Elegy. Man-made river
  • Abstracts: The road ahead is underground. Miami nice. On the road with Billy Ray Cyrus
  • Abstracts: HK, SINGAPORE BANKS LINK UP Can Singapore retain its specialness? A Singapore saga
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.