Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Business

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Business

Consistently inconsistent on private finance

Article Abstract:

The UK Accounting Standards Board's (ASB) FRS 5, 'Reporting the Substance of Transactions: the Private Finance Initiative' (PFI), seeks to clarify the highly debated issue of how to account for PFI schemes. These schemes have failed to make significant progress since their launch in 1992 largely because accountants, financial advisers, project companies and public sector clients have failed to reach a real consensus on how to account for PFI transactions. The ASB's exposure draft, which differs in some aspects from the guidance issued earlier by the UK Treasury, is a significant step towards the resolution of the PFI accounting problem, but it still offers plenty of opportunities for inconsistency of interpretation. The areas that may be vulnerable to varying interpretations include third party use, residual value and the exclusion of construction risk from the accounting analysis.

Author: Middleton, Nigel
Publisher: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales
Publication Name: Accountancy
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0001-4664
Year: 1998
Finance, Private sector, Accounting Standards Board

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Earnings per share: contingently issuable shares; employee share schemes; special dividends

Article Abstract:

The UK's Accounting Standards Board (ASB) has issued a supplement to Financial Reporting Exposure Draft (FRED) No 16, 'Earnings per Share,' in response to requests for further clarification. Commentators identified several areas that need additional guidance, including the practical application of the general principles regarding contingently issuable shares, and the impact of the proposals on employee share schemes. The ASB's supplementary guidance includes amendments to the some of the content of FRED 16, including the definition of 'special dividend,' the statement of standard accounting practice, and the Explanation section. Three options in dealing with earnings per share are discussed.

Publisher: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales
Publication Name: Accountancy
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0001-4664
Year: 1998
Pension, health, and welfare funds, Pension Funds, Stock Ownership Plans, Accounting and auditing, Dividends, Employee stock ownership plans, Earnings per share

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA



Subjects list: Standards, Accounting
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: An ideal investment for dormice. Few bargains on the second-hand market
  • Abstracts: Estimating earnings response coefficients: pooled versus firm-specific models. Global organizations and taxes: an analysis of the dividend, interest, royalty, and management fee payments between U.S. multinationals' foreign affiliates
  • Abstracts: Insider trading and the information content of earnings. Regulated managerial insider trading as a mechanism to facilitate shareholder control
  • Abstracts: Performance plan adoption and corporate performance. What is so special about emerging markets? Firm performance measures: temporal roadblocks to innovation?
  • Abstracts: Full of Eastern promise. European accounting harmonisation
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.