Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Business

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Business

Order and recency effects in complex decision-making: implications for the design of audit-oriented IDSS

Article Abstract:

The impact of bias must be addressed in the development of an intelligent decision support system for auditors. In order to develop such a system, evidence must be ordered and its recency will increase its impact. The design of a system to address these issues might include a critiquing system to mitigate bias as it occurred, a system that eliminated the problem, and the use of a network of expert team auditors to aid in the decision making process.

Author: Sutton, Steve G., Arnold, Vicky
Publisher: University of South Australia
Publication Name: Accounting Forum
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0155-9982
Year: 1996
Design and construction

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Impact of intelligent decision aids on expert and novice decision-makers' judgments

Article Abstract:

An empirical study that analyzes the impact of expert systems and intelligent decision aids on the decision-making process of expert and novice decision-makers, is conducted.The results of the study reveal that these decision aids helps to improve the decision quality in case of experts, similarly they become complex to use for novice decision-makers.

Author: Sutton, Steve G., Arnold, Vicky, Collier, Philip A., Leech, Stewart A.
Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Publication Name: Accounting and Finance
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0810-5391
Year: 2004
United States, Australia, Decision-making, Decision making, Analysis, Usage, Decision support software

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Teleological foundations for the ethical implications of expert systems development: act versus rule-based reasoning

Article Abstract:

Rule-based teleological moral reasoning does not support the use of audit expert systems. Act-based teleological reasoning supports the systems. Teleological reasoning bases decisions on comparative gain. Rule-based reasoning is different from act-based reasoning because it expands the focus from the particular act to greater implications for society.

Author: Sutton, Steve G., Arnold, Vicky, Arnold, Thomas D.
Publisher: University of South Australia
Publication Name: Accounting Forum
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0155-9982
Year: 1997
Ethical aspects

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Auditing, Technology application, Decision support systems, Expert systems
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Entrepreneurship in multinational corporations: the characteristics of subsidiary initiatives. Structural and competitive determinants of a global integration strategy
  • Abstracts: The choice of issuance procedure and the cost of competitive and negotiated underwriting: an examination of the impact of Rule 50
  • Abstracts: Organizational forms in banking: an empirical investigation of cost efficiency
  • Abstracts: Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Knowledge and the firm: overview
  • Abstracts: How does knowledge flow? Interfirm patterns in the semiconductor industry. Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.