Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Business

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Business

Safe and healthy in the office

Article Abstract:

Employers are responsible for health and safety in offices under the Offices, Shops and Railways Premises Act 1963 and the Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992. The former appliesto existing workplaces, while the latter for new workplaces. These laws providethe standards employers must maintain regarding cleanliness, overcrowding, temperature, ventilation, lighting, sanitary conveniences and washing facilities and other requirements such as the availability of drinking water. New provisions also require rest facilities for pregnant women and nursing mothers. Office safety is monitored by local authority health environmental officers who perform inspections and initiate prosecutions. In addition, s 2 ofthe Health and Safety Work Act 1974 specifies employers' statutory duties for the health, safety and welfare of their employees. Provisions for first aid andaccident reporting are also described.

Author: Keenan, Denis
Publisher: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales
Publication Name: Accountancy
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0001-4664
Year: 1993
United Kingdom, Occupational health and safety, Occupational safety and health, Social policy

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


How big is a pay packet?

Article Abstract:

Section 1(1) of UK's Wages Act of 1986 provides guidelines as to the legality of deductions from an employee's pay. According to this law, pay deductions can only be considered lawful if they are statutory payments, are specified in the written employment contract and made known to the employee previous to the deduction, or had the written consent of the employee. Some cases are exempted from this law, such as when deductions are made during industrial actions. During a total strike, it is lawful for employers not to pay striking employees and to end the employment contract. As for the matter of deducting from a payment in lieu of notice, the Court of Appeals and the House of Lords have classified such a payment as a non-contractual one. Since it it not in the same class as wages and salaries, which fall under the category of contractual payments, it should not be treated the same.

Author: Keenan, Denis
Publisher: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales
Publication Name: Accountancy
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0001-4664
Year: 1992
Laws, regulations and rules, Payroll deductions

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Law case review

Article Abstract:

Two cases decided by the High Court and the Court of Appeal in 2001 are surveyed. Issues highlighted from the cases surveyed include duty of care, share valuation, the appointment of an accountant and circumvention of pre-emption rights.

Author: Keenan, Denis
Publisher: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales
Publication Name: Accountancy
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0001-4664
Year: 2001
Cases, Valuation, Stock rights, Stockholders' preemptive rights, Duty of care (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA

Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Peace of mind that's cheap at the price. Giving investors a Pep talk
  • Abstracts: Testing the medal. What makes an expert? Bill's excellent adventure
  • Abstracts: Mexico Leverages Free Trade. Mexico Has the Gas, But Foreign Drillers are not Welcome. Trade Finance Solutions Grow With Trade
  • Abstracts: Cool, calm and quintessentially English. Slipping off the core. Winning the war
  • Abstracts: The world is not enough. The domino effect. It's good to talk
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.