Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Business

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Business

The bomb in the balance sheet

Article Abstract:

Members of the Auditing Standards Committee oppose the incorporation of intangible assets into published accounts due to: the fact that valuation figures are arbitrary; the fact that balance sheets are not summaries of corporate worth; and the fact that the inclusion of arbitrary figures is misleading and debases the value of the balance sheet. Computation of fair value of brand names is difficult but must be done in order to avoid the undervaluation of assets. To ascertain the return on assets by management, shareholders must know the totality of the asset base that is used. However, shareholders should be aware that companies incorporating intangible assets may inadvertently display an inadequate return on assets to company stockholders.

Author: Greener, Michael
Publisher: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales
Publication Name: Accountancy
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0001-4664
Year: 1989

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Off-balance sheet financing

Article Abstract:

UK corporations are making increased use of off-balance sheet financing. Some question has arisen in accounting circles as to whether the treatment of off-balance-sheet finance meets the 'true and fair' requirement of financial reporting standards. Technical Release (TR) 603 of the Institute of Chartered Accountants attempts to establish some guidelines for treating off-balance-sheet finance and to curb possible abuses. Proposals set forth in TR 603 are discussed.

Author: Tweedie, David, Kellas, John
Publisher: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales
Publication Name: Accountancy
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0001-4664
Year: 1987
Standards, Laws, regulations and rules, Corporation reports, Company reports

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Brands, goodwill, and the balance sheet

Article Abstract:

The discussion about whether companies should account for brand names has overshadowed the debate over accounting for other types of intangibles. Brands are important because they affect the price which takeover companies are willing to pay. Experts recognize that present accounting methods for intangible assets may not successfully reflect the economic conditions of a company's financial position and changes in accounting practices may be necessary.

Author: Tweedie, David, Blanchet, Jeannot
Publisher: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales
Publication Name: Accountancy
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0001-4664
Year: 1989
Goodwill (Business)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United Kingdom, Accounting and auditing, Accounting, Brand name products, Brand names, Intangible property, Intangible assets, Great Britain, Financial statements
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The horizon widens and auditors face new watershed. Sarbanes-Oxley and the law of unintended consequences
  • Abstracts: The new issues puzzle. Portfolio rebalancing and the turn-of-the-year effect. The buying and selling behavior of individual investors at the turn of the year
  • Abstracts: Annual accounting: a new way to pay VAT. Sweet reason and the VAT inspector. Late returns: excuses, excuses
  • Abstracts: Merger accounting: is laxity distorting the market? The Dearing Report: blueprint for a sound system. More tales of Dearing-do, please
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.