Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Business

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Business

The problem of unobservables in strategic management research

Article Abstract:

The controversy surrounding the issue of how to address unobservable constructs has been brewing for the most part of the 20th century. Logical positivists argue that one cannot be absolutely certain that unobservables exist. Therefore, they contend that theories containing unobservables should not be assessed based on their correspondence to reality. Instead, they should be judged based on their instrumental value as tools for the making forecasts about systemic behavior. On the other hand, the realists counter that theories with unobservables that are supported by scientific proof have a correspondence in reality. Consequently, they believe that it is possible to make statements about the truth value of these theories. This debate has significant implications for the strategic management field because most theories in this area contain unobservables. An analysis supporting the view of realists is made.

Author: Hill, Charles W.L., Godfrey, Paul C.
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Publication Name: Strategic Management Journal
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0143-2095
Year: 1995

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Risk measures in strategic management research: auld lang syne?

Article Abstract:

Empirical studies involving risk appearing in strategic management publications between 1980 and 1995 were reviewed to determine the role played by the most commonly used measures of firm and business-level risk in strategy research. The review focused on two such measures, namely, simple variance or its variance and beta or its derivatives from the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM). The results indicate a decrease in the number of studies using CAPM and mean-variance measures of risk. This trend may be attributed to researchers' disenchantment with traditional risk measures and their openness to new models of risk. A more disturbing possibility is that scholars are losing interest in risk because there is no consensus about the domain of risk and the methodologies most appropriate for its study.

Author: Ruefli, Timothy W., Collins, James M., Lacugna, Joseph R.
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Publication Name: Strategic Management Journal
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0143-2095
Year: 1999
Methods, Risk assessment, Risk (Economics)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA



Subjects list: Research, Analysis, Management research, Strategic planning (Business)
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Development of a taxonomy of services to gain strategic marketing insights. Dynamic strategic thinking
  • Abstracts: Sir Robim Duthie: man in the middle. The management of words. The Bostonian lesson
  • Abstracts: The value of separable intangibles. Off balance sheet finance: practical guide. Proposed statement of standard accounting practice - exposure draft 49: reflecting the substance of transactions in assets and liabilities: May 1990
  • Abstracts: Agency problems as antecedents to unrelated mergers and diversification: Amihud and Lev reconsidered. Post-acquisition financial performance and executive compensation
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.