Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Business

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Business

The weight of a windfall

Article Abstract:

UK personal equity plans (Peps) can be used for windfall shares received from building societies which are becoming banks in 1997. New shareholders could have to pay income tax on dividends, though this is likely to be small. Capital gains tax (CGT) could be a bigger problem since the price that shares are sold at will be taken as a gain by the tax authorities which see the cost of the shares as zero. A Pep can be used to avoid CGT, though charges for Peps may be higher than the tax saved.

Author: Prosser, David
Publisher: FT Business
Publication Name: Investors Chronicle
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0261-3115
Year: 1997
Personal Tax Planning, Personal finance, Securities, Savings and loan associations

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Labour's City Cards

Article Abstract:

The UK Labor party aims to promote a longer term view in its economic policies and protect consumers of financial services through regulation. Retail finance is seen as in need of reform and the party aims to convert the Securities and Investments Board into the main regulator, abolishing the Personal Investment Authority. Mergers and acquisitions may be more strictly controlled if the party wins and election since they are seen as promoting short-term perspectives in business.

Author: Prosser, David
Publisher: FT Business
Publication Name: Investors Chronicle
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0261-3115
Year: 1996
Financial Services, Finance and Insurance

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Peps and Tessas may face axe under Labour

Article Abstract:

The UK Labor party may abolish tax exempt special savings accounts (Tessas) and personal equity plans (Peps) if it wins an election. This would affect the financial services industry which has become dependent on fees from Peps. There is more than 25 billion pounds sterling invested in Tessas and life insurers sould be especially affected by the end of Peps. The Labor party does not plan a retrospective abolition of these investment vehicles.

Author: Prosser, David
Publisher: FT Business
Publication Name: Investors Chronicle
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0261-3115
Year: 1996

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United Kingdom, Tax planning, Financial services industry, Financial services, Economic policy, Labour Party (United Kingdom)
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The high Pep costs of saving tax. Investors the victims of changing charges. Shifting fee structures
  • Abstracts: Gehe gives Unichem a headache in drugs battle. Lloyds Chemists
  • Abstracts: The weakness of relative strength. The warning bells of history are ringing
  • Abstracts: What waste of energy. Turn on the power. Power and the people
  • Abstracts: Agglomerate, or die. A buyer's market. Basket of complaints
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.