Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Business

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Business

Who wants US GAAP?

Article Abstract:

There is growing acceptance that the harmonization of international accounting standards can be achieved without overdependence on US generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). There are basic philosophical differences between US GAAP and the standards formulated by the International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC). The main difference is that US standards are based on the principle of uniformity while IASs are based on the concept of equivalence. The American accounting framework demands uniform information from all companies participating in the same capital markets. In contrast, IASs allow the co-existence of two financial reporting methods that produce different but equally useful information.

Author: Wilson, Allister
Publisher: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales
Publication Name: Accountancy
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0001-4664
Year: 1998
International aspects

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


If it isn't useful, get rid of it

Article Abstract:

Statement of Standard Accounting Practice 10 (SSAP 10) is an inadequate accounting standard, and fund statements prepared under it fail to provide readers with useful information. SSAP 10 was originally written in 1975 to develop a minimum standard of disclosure in funds statements in order to supply users with a better accounting of their resource flows. The standard has several shortcomings including: concentrating on balance sheet classifications instead of business activities; failing to establish clear goals for funds statements; and failing to promote reporting practice uniformity.

Author: Wilson, Allister
Publisher: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales
Publication Name: Accountancy
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0001-4664
Year: 1989
Laws, regulations and rules, Cash flow, Great Britain, Fund accounting

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Small companies need different standards

Article Abstract:

It is inappropriate and useless to apply Companies Act 1985 and historical cost accounting procedures to small businesses, especially when they are owner-operated. The information provided by standard financial reports may be useful for large corporations, since investors and creditors have an interest in the data. Usually no more than a bank is interested in a small business's statements. Therefore the use of cash flows and net realizable values are more practical and informative than conventional, corporate reports.

Author: Wilson, Allister
Publisher: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales
Publication Name: Accountancy
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0001-4664
Year: 1987
Small business

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Standards, Accounting, Corporation reports, Company reports, United Kingdom, Accounting and auditing
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Congress grapples with a useful definition of insider trading
  • Abstracts: Who pays the piper? What happens to your cheque?
  • Abstracts: VDU health and safety: the rules. Put it in writing. New bill imposes 'strict' liability
  • Abstracts: Wither the US dollar now? Post-Iraq dangers. World economic prospects 1987-88
  • Abstracts: What the members want. A single market for audit. The changing role of the Institute as regulator
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.