Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Economics

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Economics

How liable should a lender be? The case of judgment-proof firms and environmental risk

Article Abstract:

A model of a potentially judgment-proof firm, a lender and a potential victim is presented. In this model, increased lender liability results in a higher accident frequency and lower efficiency. An examination of full, partial and zero lender-liability rules shows that partial lender liability and an equivalent minimum equity requirement generates the highest level of efficiency. However, the former can produce a higher lender contribution to the victim than the latter. In view of these results, the policy under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act needs re-evaluation.

Author: Pitchford, Rohan
Publisher: American Economic Association
Publication Name: American Economic Review
Subject: Economics
ISSN: 0002-8282
Year: 1995
Models, Liability for environmental damages, Lender liability

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


An economic analysis of Australian damage remedies for misleading prospectuses: Trade Practices Act versus Corporations Law

Article Abstract:

The proposal to replace strict liability with due diligence in Australia's prosecution of prospectus cases is problematic. Strict liability under the Trade Practices Act adequately addresses misleading or deceptive behavior by large firms. While due diligence under the Corporations Law may be more effective to address violations by smaller firms, it is likely to increase the cost and complexity of legal proceedings due to a higher demand for accountants and lawyers.

Author: Pitchford, Rohan
Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Publication Name: Australian Economic Review
Subject: Economics
ISSN: 0004-9018
Year: 1998
Australia

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


An Economic Analysis of Australian Damage Remedies for Misleading Prospectuses: Trade Practices Act versus Corporations Law

Article Abstract:

Australian investments are affected by the accuracy and honesty of prospectuses. Due diligence is an inferior means to protect liability for large firms, but may be the better choice for smaller companies. In general, reliance on due diligence adds complexity and cost to legal action, and will increase business for accountants and lawyers more than improve reporting accuracy.

Author: Pitchford, Rohan
Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Publication Name: Australian Economic Review
Subject: Economics
ISSN: 0004-9018
Year: 1998
Interpretation and construction, Ethical aspects, Business ethics, Liability (Law), Legal liability

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules, Prospectuses
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The Economics of the Apocalypse: Modelling the Biblical Book of Revelation. Collusive aspects of cost revelation through antidumping complaints
  • Abstracts: Prepacks: an empirical study of prepackaged bankruptcies. CEO incentive plans and corporate liquidation policy
  • Abstracts: Race, competition and differential wages. Male interracial wage differentials: competing explanations. Discrimination in the post-civil rights era: beyond market interactions
  • Abstracts: Agglomeration and economic development: import substitution vs. trade liberalisation. International trade, factor mobility, and trade costs
  • Abstracts: Antidumping policies in the United States and the European Community. Credibility and disinflation in the European monetary system
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.