Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Economics

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Economics

More on the Chicago tradition

Article Abstract:

David Laidler argues that there was a connection between Hawtrey and Harvard, and that this in turn contributed to the origins of the 1930s Chicago tradition. However, Laidler underestimates the influence of Paul Douglas in this tradition. Douglas, in fact, contributed greatly to the Chicago tradition by being the first to use the quantity theory of money to advocate for an expansionary fiscal policy. That Friedman never mentions Douglas in no way undermines Douglas' importance.

Author: Tavlas, George S.
Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing, Ltd.
Publication Name: Journal of Economic Studies
Subject: Economics
ISSN: 0144-3585
Year: 1998

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


More on Hawtrey, Harvard and Chicago

Article Abstract:

The economic writings of Ralph Hawtrey, Lauchlin Currie and Milton Friedman show remarkable similarities, leading to the conclusion that Friedman drew his idea from this "Chicago tradition" of macroeconomic theories. Critics of this theory have pointed to the writings of Paul Douglas, but Douglas is not integral to the Chicago tradition. New evidence and further textual analysis lends support to the theory that the Chicago tradition drew from Hawtrey and Harvard economists.

Author: Laidler, David
Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing, Ltd.
Publication Name: Journal of Economic Studies
Subject: Economics
ISSN: 0144-3585
Year: 1998
Hawtrey, Ralph

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Hawtrey, Harvard and Chicago: a final comment

Article Abstract:

Tavlas argues that Laidler's theory of the origins of the Chicago tradition under-represent the influence of Paul Douglas and over-emphasized the Harvard connection. However, the Harvard professors cited as sources for the Chicago tradition were not part of the Harvard establishment, thereby accounting for the differences of economic perspectives. Douglas, too, was not integral to the Chicago tradition and was not considered a serious thinker by his Chicago colleagues.

Author: Laidler, David
Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing, Ltd.
Publication Name: Journal of Economic Studies
Subject: Economics
ISSN: 0144-3585
Year: 1998

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Influence, Economics, Criticism and interpretation, Economists, Macroeconomics, Chicago school of economics, Monetarism, Douglas, Paul
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: A note on the organic composition of capital and profit rates. What's behind the rise in profitability in the US in the 1980s and 1990s
  • Abstracts: A note on the organic composition of capital and profit rates. part 2 Why has the U.S. economy become less correlated with the rest of the world?
  • Abstracts: Property rights theory, transaction costs theory, and agency theory: an organizational economics approach to strategic management
  • Abstracts: Central bank independence - only part of the inflation story: a comment. Central bank independence: only part of the inflation story
  • Abstracts: Transformation of banks and bank services. Financial institutions in transition: banks and financial markets
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.