Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Economics

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Economics

Specifying and testing output and pricing structures of alternative macroeconomic models

Article Abstract:

A framework for helping economic modellers make a more informed selection between alternative models is proposed. The framework is used for specifying a model with importable, exportable and non-traded goods. A simple two-stage test is then used to choose a particular model structure based on economic data. The test is not foolproof, so modellers will still have to use common sense and knowledge of the economic features of a certain country to determine the appropriate theoretical models.

Author: Paloni, Alberto
Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Publication Name: Oxford Bulletin of Economics & Statistics
Subject: Economics
ISSN: 0305-9049
Year: 1996
Pricing

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


On comparing macroeconomic models using forecast encompassing tests

Article Abstract:

Studies have revealed that the forecast encompassing test has an implicit null hypothesis that combines elements of parameter constancy and parametric encompassing. It has also been found that forecast encompassing is only a necessary condition for parameter constancy and parametric encompassing. Forecasting encompassing tests are ideal for evaluating and comparing macroeconomic models. The use of regression-based techniques can benefit forecast performance evaluation.

Author: Andrews, M.J., Minford, A.P.L., Riley, J.
Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Publication Name: Oxford Bulletin of Economics & Statistics
Subject: Economics
ISSN: 0305-9049
Year: 1996
Administration of General Economic Programs, Economic Statistics & Research, Research, Testing, Economic conditions, Economic indicators

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


On comparing macroeconomic models using forecast encompassing tests

Article Abstract:

The macroeconometric model comparison method proposed by Y.Y. Chong and D.F. Hendry in 1986 is examined. The method calls for the use of forecast encompassing regressions, where outturns are regressed on competing forecasts. Results show that forecast encompassing tests are incapable of separating a model from another based on one-year-ahead forecasts. Although all models win once, conclusions do not match those based on root-mean-square-forecast-error criteria.

Author: Andrews, M.J., Minford, A.P.L., Riley, J.
Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Publication Name: Oxford Bulletin of Economics & Statistics
Subject: Economics
ISSN: 0305-9049
Year: 1996
Forecasting, Business forecasting

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Models, Analysis, Econometrics, Macroeconomics, Business models, Economic forecasting
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Monetary policies in an intertemporal macroeconomic model with imperfect competition. Examining the long-run effect of money on economic growth
  • Abstracts: Stochastic control for economic models: past, present and the paths ahead. Migration of the Lucas critique with stochastic control methods
  • Abstracts: Combing time series models for forecasting. Stable seasonal pattern models for forecast revision: a comparative study
  • Abstracts: The Macroeconomics of Self-Fulfilling Prophecies: a review essay. Bounded rationality in macroeconomics: a review essay
  • Abstracts: The efficiency of bank branches. Banks and macroeconomic disturbances under predetermined exchange rates. On avoiding bank runs
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.