Determining infringement by X-ray diffraction

Article Abstract:

X-ray diffraction analysis was used to determine in patent-infringement suit involving a SO(sub x) reducing additive admixed with a cracking catalyst. Zeolite was the catalyst while ceria was the additive. The two additives in the patent case was NO-SOX and NO-SOX-PC which were made by Intercat and used by Conoco Inc, two firms which were sued by WR Grace and Co. It was determined that five of the patents were infringed by two additives.

Petroleum Refineries, Nonmanufacturing technology, Fluid Catalytic Cracking

---

How to be an expert witness

Article Abstract:

The important factors of the litigation process of testifying are presented in detail. The challenges involved in becoming a technical witness are also discussed along with list of three organizations in the United States that refer the experts to the lawyers.

Management dynamics, Management, Practice, Company business management, Evidence, Expert, Expert evidence, Testimony

---

Similar abstracts:

• Abstracts: Designing quality into work life. How to become a quality person. Mitsubishi seeks to create a model U.S. workplace
• Abstracts: A mine of information. Hollow fibers dry more effectively
• Abstracts: A wake-up call in water management. Identify appropriate water reclamation technologies

This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.