Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Government

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Government

Remembering equal opportunity: clearing the undergrowth in New Brunswick

Article Abstract:

Two decades ago, the New Brunswick government began implementing the Equal Opportunity program, a sweeping reform of provincial-municipal relations. It abolished the elected county governments, centralized some important functions at the provincial level, and instituted equalization in municipal financing. Here it is argued that the EO program had redistributive aspects which were crucial in selling it politically. The drive toward efficiency, however, was more fundamental. Centralized, uniform administration was to produce static gains and also dynamic ones, as obstacles to economic growth were eliminated. Finally, the provincial government' capacity to plan and accelerate development was enhanced, so EO had great political implications. Not only did it increase the stakes of political participation at the centre, but it also promised citizens more control over policy than had existed when neither level of government could act decisively. This internal reform had exogenous causes. New economic challenges were sensed in New Brunswick as in other provinces which essayed structural reform in order to manage them. Particularly important in New Brunswick were federal government initiatives framed as shared-cost programs, which demanded a coherent provincial response. But it took brave leadership to push reform so far, so creatively. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)

Author: Young, R.A.
Publisher: Institute of Public Administration of Canada
Publication Name: Canadian Public Administration
Subject: Government
ISSN: 0008-4840
Year: 1987
Administrative agencies, New Brunswick, Public administration, Government reorganizations

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


An approach to studying local government autonomy: the Ontario experience

Article Abstract:

This study examines the issue of local government autonomy through the study of municipal policy-making. After a brief review of the debate over local autonomy, local government policies are grouped into four categories - developmental, allocative, redistributive and constitutional. The evidence examined derives from Ontario during the period from 1968 to 1988. Some increase in autonomy is found in the last three categories but not in that of developmental policy. The fundamental sources of municipal autonomy are found in the politicization of issues at the local level and in the behaviour of the provincial government, which may or may not see benefits to be derived from changes in local autonomy. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)

Author: Woodside, Kenneth
Publisher: Institute of Public Administration of Canada
Publication Name: Canadian Public Administration
Subject: Government
ISSN: 0008-4840
Year: 1990
Local government, Ontario

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA



Subjects list: Political aspects, Provinces
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Equality of opportunity and optimal cash and in-kind policies. Persistent media bias
  • Abstracts: A Pareto-improving commodity tax reform under a smooth nonlinear income tax. Government credibility and policy choice: evidence from the Pennsylvania earned income tax
  • Abstracts: Unequal plurality: Towards an asymmetric power model of British politics. The internal and external face of New Labour's political economy
  • Abstracts: Tiebout revisited: redrawing jurisdictional boundaries. Looking for multiple equilibria when geography matters: German city growth and the WWII shock
  • Abstracts: Not anonymous: ministerial responsibility and the British accounting officers. Ministers of state to assist: weighing the costs and the benefits
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.