Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Health

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Health

Calif. rate cuts suggest managed competition works

Article Abstract:

The California Public Employees Retirement System (Calpers) kept premiums for its members to 1.5% increase for 1993. The low cost illustrates its bargaining power with health maintenance organizations (HMO) and other providers. For example, when HMO Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc raised its rates, Calpers instituted an enrollment freeze that prompted the HMO to drop the increase. Calpers' experience demonstrates one of the first examples of the health care reform theory of managed competition. However, some observers fear costs will be transferred to smaller organizations with less bargaining power.

Author: Meyer, Harris
Publisher: American Medical Association
Publication Name: American Medical News
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0001-1843
Year: 1993
Insurance agents, brokers, & service, California, Health insurance industry, California Public Employees Retirement System

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Employers lead reform crusade: with health costs shrinking profits, businesses see to lose

Article Abstract:

Employers are seeking ways to lower their healthcare insurance costs for workers. However, their plans for reform depend on the size of their company. Large companies with huge insurance rolls favor nationalized healthcare to relieve them of this burden. Smaller firms, who may not insure their workers at all, favor the current system with the addition of price controls. Descriptions of the the most influential firms, organizations and individuals are presented.

Author: Meyer, Harris
Publisher: American Medical Association
Publication Name: American Medical News
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0001-1843
Year: 1993
Economic aspects, Employers, Health insurance

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Federal plan a guide to Medicare reform

Article Abstract:

The Federal Employees Health Benefit Program (FEHBP) could be a model for reforms to the Medicare system. FEHBP, which serves 10 million patients, has often been better at controlling costs than Medicare or the private sector. The $15 billion program is controlled by the Office of Personnel Management, and it offers participants in each market a choice from as many as two dozen plans.

Author: Meyer, Harris
Publisher: American Medical Association
Publication Name: American Medical News
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0001-1843
Year: 1995
Administration of Public Health Programs, Health Care Services, Analysis, Compensation and benefits, Medical care, Public employees, Government employees, Medicare

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Management, Social policy, Health care reform, Employee benefits
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: 10 Commandments for managed competition. Is medicine doing all it can to ensure health and safety? An earful about why lawyers support process patents
  • Abstracts: Urea kinetics: comparison of oral and intravenous dose regimens. Urea kinetics varies in Jamaican women and men in relation of adiposity, lean body mass and protein intake
  • Abstracts: EPA's lead balloon: how physicians helped sink a federal plan to dig up a corner of paradise
  • Abstracts: Nuclear waste gridlock risks research, ups treatment cost. Feds take aim at PHOs; IRS ruling could leave doctors facing more risks than benefits
  • Abstracts: Somalia operation just one of many demands on US military medicine. Extraordinary epidemiologic, environmental health experience emerges from Operation Restore Hope
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.