Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Health

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Health

Ethical conflicts in regulating the start of life

Article Abstract:

Technological interventions on the reproductive process such as abortion, prenatal screening of the fetus (fetal screening), in vitro fertilization (IVF), and intensive care for preterm infants raised ethical questions that still remain unsolved. Each of these interventions also have a separate guiding principle that justifies its implementation. Variation in the principle can be due to specialization of health care, varying aim of each intervention, the way medical practice works and how new technology is introduced to the practice.

Author: Santalahti, Paivi, Hemminki, Elina, Louhiala, Pekka
Publisher: Johns Hopkins University Press
Publication Name: Perspectives in Biology and Medicine
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0031-5982
Year: 1997
Physiological regulation, Human reproductive technology, Human reproduction

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Julius B. Richmond and Head Start: the dream become reality

Article Abstract:

Academic pediatrician Julius B. Richmonds' medical research program for disadvantaged children is evaluated. The 'Head Start' program was aimed at reversing developmental decline in poor children. Initial studies were conducted at the Syracuse Children's Center. Although the project encountered a multitude of problems and was nearly discontinued it was subsequently implemented serving thousands of poor communities in the US.

Author: Bussey, Charles J.
Publisher: Johns Hopkins University Press
Publication Name: Perspectives in Biology and Medicine
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0031-5982
Year: 1993
Research, United States. Administration for Children and Families. Head Start Bureau, Richmond, Julius B.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


When restrictions become restraints

Article Abstract:

Restrictive covenants are increasingly being used in medical training programs, requiring students to sign non-competitive documents before they are accepted into competitive programs. The American Medical Association frowns upon such covenants because they give these institutions unequal bargaining power. Furthermore, these documents interfere with the patient-physician relationship.

Publisher: American Medical Association
Publication Name: American Medical News
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0001-1843
Year: 1997
Health care industry, Column, Medical students, Ethical aspects

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Evaluation
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Topical microbicides: current status and research considerations for adolescent girls. The value of workplace versus income in determining HIV status and other STDs among a sample of Spanish sex workers
  • Abstracts: Effects of admission to a teaching hospital on the cost and quality of care for Medicare beneficiaries. The folly of teaching-hospital mergers
  • Abstracts: Gliadel wafers for treatment of brain tumors. Caffeine addiction and its effects. Treatment of khat addiction
  • Abstracts: Rules of a smart patient. Breaking the sound barrier: the best personal CD players to use while exercising. Breaking all the rules
  • Abstracts: Prostatitis: a common, other vexing problem. The porn problem: why censorship backfires on women. Itching: usually harmless, but it may herald a serious problem
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.