Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Health

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Health

Evidence-based complementary medicine: a contradiction in terms?

Article Abstract:

Complementary and alternative therapies should be subjected to the same rigorous scientific analysis used in evaluating conventional medical therapies. Alternative treatments are popular, particularly among patients with rheumatic diseases. Clients of alternative practitioners are often more satisfied with alternative care than with care by physicians. Few complementary practices have been subjected to scientific scrutiny, and some that have have failed the test. Not only is good data lacking on the effectiveness of many complementary treatments, such as acupuncture, herbalism, and chiropractic, but little research has been conducted to determine the risks to patients. Risk-benefit analyses should precede the adoption of any therapy, complementary or conventional.

Author: Ernst, E.
Publisher: British Medical Association
Publication Name: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0003-4967
Year: 1999
Analysis, Alternative medicine, Evidence-based medicine

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Idiopathic perianal pruritus: Washing compared with topical corticosteroids

Article Abstract:

A comparison between the effectiveness of topical steroids and perianal cleansing in the treatment of idiopathic perianal pruritus is made. The study was which was conducted among seventy-two patients with the complaint of Idiopathic perianal indicates that perianal cleansers can be used as a safe first step treatment in idiopathic perianal pruritus.

Author: Oztas, M.O., Oztas, P., Onder, M.
Publisher: British Medical Association
Publication Name: Postgraduate Medical Journal
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0032-5473
Year: 2004
Care and treatment, Corticosteroids, Dosage and administration, Pruritus, Itching, Corticosteroid drugs

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Limitations of "Pragmatic" Trials

Article Abstract:

Clinical trials are of different types: efficacy and pragmatic. The efficacy trial uses optimal conditions (near laboratory). The pragmatic trial reflects the reality of clinical practice. The pragmatic trials should only be used as a complement to efficacy trials to test results in a real life situation.

Author: Ernst, E., Canter, P.H.
Publisher: British Medical Association
Publication Name: Postgraduate Medical Journal
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0032-5473
Year: 2005
Clinical trials

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United Kingdom, Evaluation
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Increased muscular efficiency during lactation in Colombian women. Vitamin K in breast milk: no influence of maternal dietary intake
  • Abstracts: Recent advances in pulmonary medicine, part 2. Guiding aerosol deposition in the lung. A randomized trial of inhaled cyclosporine in lung-transplant recipients
  • Abstracts: Antidepressant use in psychiatry and medicine: importance for dental practice. Age Effects on Antidepressant-Induced ManicConversion
  • Abstracts: The guide to the management of one-piece urinary sheaths. Complementary therapies in life-limiting conditions
  • Abstracts: Product news. Metastatic tumors in the jaws
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.