Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Health

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Health

Peer review and federal regulations

Article Abstract:

The White House Office of Management and Budget's bulletin on peer review may not be the best way of ensuring that public policy decisions are based on scientific evidence. The bulletin establishes government-wide standards for peer review that would apply to all government agencies that fund scientific research. However, this could be used by special interest groups that hope to block certain public policy decisions that would affect them adversely.

Author: Steinbrook, Robert
Publisher: Massachusetts Medical Society
Publication Name: The New England Journal of Medicine
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0028-4793
Year: 2004
Product standards, safety, & recalls, Standards, Medical policy, Health policy, Peer review

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Compensation for injured research subjects

Article Abstract:

The study focuses on the long-standing issue of compensation for injured research subjects as participation in clinical risks carrier some risk. The contrary view is that routine compensation is not required, as subjects are made aware of the risk through the informed-consent process, understand them, and voluntarily agree to participate.

Author: Steinbrook, Robert
Publisher: Massachusetts Medical Society
Publication Name: The New England Journal of Medicine
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0028-4793
Year: 2006
Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences, Research and Testing Services, Medical Research, Epilepsy & Muscle Disease R&D, Administration of Public Health Programs, Health Research Programs, Medicine, Experimental, Medical research volunteers

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Science, politics, and federal advisory committees

Article Abstract:

The Federal Advisory Committee Act established uniform procedures for committees and led to the elimination of many of the groups. Advisory boards and councils perform the second level of peer review for research grants and advice the institutes about policies and programs.

Author: Steinbrook, Robert
Publisher: Massachusetts Medical Society
Publication Name: The New England Journal of Medicine
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0028-4793
Year: 2004
Executive advisory bodies, Peer review of research grant proposals

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Government regulation
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Money matters roil Cleveland Clinic's reputation. Richard Chaisson
  • Abstracts: Interview with a leader: Kathy Seifert. The mane idea. New girl in town!
  • Abstracts: Primary care and specialist relationship: customer-supplier. Psychiatric manual released in primary care version
  • Abstracts: Ways to make treating violence a part of your practice. AIDS vaccine trial called disappointing, but not futile
  • Abstracts: Newspaper wins right to publish peer review. Visitation guidelines promote safe, satisfying environments
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.