Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Health

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Health

The U.S. Postal Service and cancer screening -- stamps of approval?

Article Abstract:

Two doctors believe the US Postal Service should cancel its plan to publish a commemorative stamp on prostate cancer awareness. This stamp, to be issued in June, 1999, follows closely on the heels of the breast cancer awareness stamp issued in July, 1998. All commemorative stamps are suggested by the Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee (CSAC) . Both of these stamps were opposed by the US Postal Service because laws prohibit the agency from issuing fund-raising stamps. There is no evidence that increased screening for prostate cancer will lead to lower mortality rates. CSAC should consult with the medical profession before recommending health-related stamps.

Author: Schwartz, Lisa M., Woloshin, Steven
Publisher: Massachusetts Medical Society
Publication Name: The New England Journal of Medicine
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0028-4793
Year: 1999
Health aspects, Breast cancer, Commemorative postage stamps

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Misunderstandings about the effects of race and sex on physicians' referrals for cardiac catheterization

Article Abstract:

Researchers suggest ways to report the results of medical research in the popular press. The results of a study in the New England Journal of Medicine was incorrectly reported by several news media. The study showed that black women with chest pain were not referred for cardiac catheterization as often as black men, white men, or white women. However, the news media incorrectly said that all black patients were referred for catheterization less often. Part of the problem was use of the odds ratio rather than the risk ratio.

Author: Welch, H. Gilbert, Schwartz, Lisa M., Woloshin, Steven
Publisher: Massachusetts Medical Society
Publication Name: The New England Journal of Medicine
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0028-4793
Year: 1999
Care and treatment, Analysis, Demographic aspects, Health, Medical referral, Health and race, Ethnic groups, Chest pain, Cardiac catheterization, Heart catheterization

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Screening men for prostate and colorectal cancer in the United States: does practice reflect the evidence?

Article Abstract:

Screening men for prostate cancer is more common than screening them for colorectal cancer even though the benefits of colorectal cancer screening have been proven whereas the benefits of prostate cancer screening have not. This was the conclusion of researchers who analyzed data on 49,315 men surveyed as part of the 2001 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. This shows that health screening does not always comply with the evidence for or against screening.

Author: Schwartz, Lisa M., Woloshin, Steven, Sirovich, Brenda E.
Publisher: American Medical Association
Publication Name: JAMA, The Journal of the American Medical Association
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0098-7484
Year: 2003
Labor Distribution by Employer, Diagnosis, Statistics, Colorectal cancer

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Prostate cancer, Medical screening, Health screening
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The future is in your hands. Reaping the benefits of teamwork. Name-check
  • Abstracts: The effects on hemostasis of oral contraceptives containing desogestrel. Pharmacokinetics of desogestrel
  • Abstracts: Assessment and prediction of long-term cure in patients with the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome: the best approach
  • Abstracts: Is new billing system needed to survive managed care? Help your patients change. Knowing what patients think could help you survive
  • Abstracts: Brother, can you paradigm; creative doctors can get on top of health system changes. Market gains for physicians?
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.