Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Human resources and labor relations

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Human resources and labor relations

Health plans--enforcement of right to reimbursement not available under ERISA Section502(a)(3)

Article Abstract:

In the case Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company v. Janette Knudson, the U.S. Supreme Court reiterated its hesitancy to change the enforcement structur e configured in ERISA by allowing remedies that ERISA did not specifically author ize in its text. The court held that Section502(c)(3) does not authorize a plan to bring an action to enforce the plan's reimbursement provisions because recovering monetary damages for reimbursement is not relief that generally is available in equit y and consequently, is not "othe r equitable relief" within the meaning of Section502(a)(3).

Publisher: International Society of Certified Employee Benefit Specialists
Publication Name: Benefits Quarterly
Subject: Human resources and labor relations
ISSN: 8756-1263
Year: 2003
Life insurance industry, Knudson, Janette, Great-West Life and Annuity Insurance Co.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Health plans - false enrollment information - standard of review

Article Abstract:

The decision given by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Shipley v. Arkansas Blue Cross and Blue Shield, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 13256 (8TH Cir. 2003) is presented. The case is about administrator's discretionary powers to collect information from enrollment form in employer's ERISA health plan, which formed an integral part of the contract of insurance. William Shipley filed the case.

Publisher: International Society of Certified Employee Benefit Specialists
Publication Name: Benefits Quarterly
Subject: Human resources and labor relations
ISSN: 8756-1263
Year: 2005
Insurance fraud, United States. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit, Shipley, William, Arkansas Blue Cross and Blue Shield

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Standard of review - arbitrary and capricious

Article Abstract:

The decision given by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in the case of Lopes v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, 443 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2003) is presented. The case is about using administration discretion for determining the eligibility for employee benefit. George Lopes, an employee of Fishbach Corporation filed the suit under ERISA.

Publisher: International Society of Certified Employee Benefit Specialists
Publication Name: Benefits Quarterly
Subject: Human resources and labor relations
ISSN: 8756-1263
Year: 2005
Engineering Services, Executive changes & profiles, Engineering for Plastic, Rubber Prodcts, Officials and employees, Engineering firms, Employee benefits, Fiduciary duties, Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., United States. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit, Lopes, George, Fishbach Corp.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Company legal issue, Cases, Insurance industry
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Talent management: From hire to retire. Don't stifle intuition in your workplace
  • Abstracts: Personnel management: the tone of tomorrow. Personnel management: the tenor of today. Which HR accounting system fits your organization?
  • Abstracts: Performance measurement and management: a tool for strategy execution. Downsizing: practices in manufacturing firms
  • Abstracts: Are consultants set up to fail? An HRIS marketing strategy. Chase Manhattan manages HRIS implementation
  • Abstracts: Strategic individual assessment: issues in providing reliable descriptions. Designing and implementing global staffing systems: Part I - leaders in global staffing
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.