"Promise and peril in implementing pay-for-performance" by Michael Beer and Mark D. Canon

Article Abstract:

The risks associated with pay-for-performance plans are addressed by Barry Gerhart. He agrees with Beer and Cannon's argument that companies already having strong employee relations may have the most to lose in experimenting with the types of pay-for-performance programs they describe.

Business Personnel Management, Human resource management

---

"Promise and peril in implementing pay-for-performance" by Michael Beer and Mark D. Canon

Article Abstract:

A comment on Michael Beer's and Mark Cannon's 'Promise and Peril in implementing pay-for-performance' by Patrick Dailey is presented. According to him, pay-for-performance (PFP) programs may be unproductive in influencing behavior of employees due to high costs of implementation.

---

"Promise and peril in implementing pay-for-performance" by Michael Beer and Mark D. Canon

Article Abstract:

The information provided by Michael Beer and Mark D. Canon is very informative but it is argued that conclusions given are too broad for three reasons. Gerald Ledford mentions some specific conditions faced by Hewlett Packard that explain the abandonment of the new pay programs.

Beliefs, opinions and attitudes, Beer, Michael, Canon, Mark D.

Similar abstracts:

• Abstracts: "Promise and peril in implementing pay-for-performance" by Michael Beer and Mark D. Canon. part 2

This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.