Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Human resources and labor relations

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Human resources and labor relations

Retiree health benefits: an expanded retirement planning model

Article Abstract:

The growing tencency by employers to incorporate retiree health benefits into a total retirement package has revealed the total incompatibility of those benefits with other retirement plans, particularly pensions. Employers have also come to view retiree health benefits as a shared respoonsibility between retirees and their companies as well as a reflection of their organizations' overall human resource goals. Thus, designs for retiree health plans must complement other parts of a total retirement package that the company's financial and human resource goals may be attained.

Author: Waters, James G.
Publisher: International Society of Certified Employee Benefit Specialists
Publication Name: Benefits Quarterly
Subject: Human resources and labor relations
ISSN: 8756-1263
Year: 1992
Analysis, Contracts, Health insurance, Retirement benefits

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Definition of employee

Article Abstract:

The Supreme Court decided to remand the Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co v. Darden to the court of appeals to determine if Robert Darden could be considered as an employee under traditional agency law principles. Darden claimed to be an employee of Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company under the ERISA which makes his retirement benefits unforfeitable. The Court based its decision on the definition of employee under the Fair Labor Standards Act in Rutherford Food Corp v. McComb since it covers those who might not be considered under the traditional common-law test.

Publisher: International Society of Certified Employee Benefit Specialists
Publication Name: Benefits Quarterly
Subject: Human resources and labor relations
ISSN: 8756-1263
Year: 1992
Fire, marine, and casualty insurance, Holding companies, not elsewhere classified, Cases, Laws, regulations and rules, Insurance industry, Workers, United States. Supreme Court, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co., Darden, Robert

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Why SAR is important to US companies doing business in Mexico. Employer pensions and personal savings: conflict or complement?
  • Abstracts: Multinational companies contemplate creation of European works councils. Employee benefits in the global economy: what US benefit professionals should know about internationally mobile employees
  • Abstracts: Changes in pension plan coverage and participation rates, 1979-1988
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.