Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Insurance

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Insurance

Federal government revamps employee benefits policy for older workers

Article Abstract:

Older Workers Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA) and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act have changed the way corporate America is dealing with its older workers. OWBPA was written to protect workers against age discrimination in regard to company benefit programs. OWBPA legislated 'equal cost or equal benefits,' which means companies must provide equal benefits to young or old or prove why costs would be higher for the same benefits for older workers. To prove that benefit expenses are higher for older employees, firms can use a benefit-by-benefit cost comparison or a benefits package cost review.

Author: Wiencek, Thomas J.
Publisher: Aspen Publishers, Inc.
Publication Name: Compensation & Benefits Management
Subject: Insurance
ISSN: 0748-061X
Year: 1992
Age discrimination

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Nondiscrimination requirements for welfare plans

Article Abstract:

The Internal Revenue Service and the US Labor Dept maintain stringent regulations that govern employee benefits. Employers should not discriminate in favor of highly-paid workers in terms of benefits, eligibility, employee participation or employee and employer contributions. Rules that govern non-discrimination requirements for employer-provided group benefits are presented. Regulations that affect cafeteria plans, self-insured medical insurance plans, life insurance plans and dependent care plans are also discussed.

Author: Haslinger, John A., Shannon, Ellen F.
Publisher: Aspen Publishers, Inc.
Publication Name: Compensation & Benefits Management
Subject: Insurance
ISSN: 0748-061X
Year: 1993
Employment discrimination

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The status of welfare benefits: another dimension

Article Abstract:

Decisions by the US Supreme Court have indicated that the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) affords employers the flexibility to change or abolish welfare benefit plans. This flexibility is given to motivate companies to provide generous plans because they have the option to remove them when the company's financial condition declines. Section 510 provides a countercheck for this flexibility by mandating a formal change process of the plan.

Author: Lantry, Terry L.
Publisher: Aspen Publishers, Inc.
Publication Name: Compensation & Benefits Management
Subject: Insurance
ISSN: 0748-061X
Year: 1998
Regulation, Licensing, and Inspection of Miscellaneous Commercial Sectors, Retirement Benefits, Pension & Welfare Benefit Prgrm

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules, Employee benefits
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Agents, carriers and employers benefit from purchasing coalitions. Managed care tries to improve bad reviews
  • Abstracts: PBGC deficit causes concern on Capitol Hill. Employee benefits and the Clinton budget
  • Abstracts: Compensation and benefits laws affecting the flexible workforce. Why put workers' compensation under ERISA?
  • Abstracts: Redesigning the Medicare benefit package: defined benefits or defined contributions? Joint-labor management committees can solve the health care puzzle
  • Abstracts: Group legal plans: a low-cost, high-value employee benefit. New budget and tax laws affect wide array of benefit issues
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.