Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Insurance

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Insurance

Supreme Court allows amendment of overfunded contributory defined benefit plan

Article Abstract:

The Supreme Court has ruled that employers do not violate the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) when contributory defined benefit plans are amended by introducing a new noncontributory benefit structure designed to use $1 billion in surplus accumulated in the plan. The High Court stood by its previous decisions that employers do not act as fiduciary agents when they amend employee benefit plans. ERISA's anti-inurement and vesting provisions are not violated because employees are entitled only to their accrued benefits under a defined benefit plan where employers normally assumes the risk.

Author: Mamorsky, Jeffrey D.
Publisher: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Compensation and Benefits
Subject: Insurance
ISSN: 0893-780X
Year: 1999
Regulation, Licensing, and Inspection of Miscellaneous Commercial Sectors, Insurance Regulation, Pension funds, Insurance law

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Employer must notify participants of reduction in future benefit accrual

Article Abstract:

The US Court of Appeals ruled that an employer violates the ERISA if he does not inform benefit plan participants of amendments that would decrease expected benefits from the plan. Benefit planners must communicate any changes in the plan to its holders to satisfy ERISA regulations. They must also inform plan holders of any event that may affect the status of their benefit plan.

Author: Mamorsky, Jeffrey D.
Publisher: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Compensation and Benefits
Subject: Insurance
ISSN: 0893-780X
Year: 1992
Employers

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Today's retirement plan environment leaves much for concern

Article Abstract:

The need for organizations to be aware of the importance of internal control and self-audit procedures regarding their pension and benefit plans is discussed.

Author: Mamorsky, Jeffrey D.
Publisher: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Compensation and Benefits
Subject: Insurance
ISSN: 0893-780X
Year: 2004
Strategy & planning, Capital funds & cash flow, Planning, Accounting and auditing, Associations, institutions, etc., Company business planning, Organizations

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules, Defined benefit plans, Retirement benefits
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The role of company stock in a defined contribution plan. The less than perfect defined contribution plan
  • Abstracts: Supreme Court reverses Curtiss-Wright. Editor's view. Brochure constituted an ERISA plan
  • Abstracts: Running out of the clock. Protect brand equity in the global marketplace
  • Abstracts: Maximizing the value of the compensation portfolio. Returning "design" to health care benefit design. Managing health care costs: the pre-financed method
  • Abstracts: Creating a win-win solution for 401(k) administration. Defined contribution plan providers should not fly blind
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.