Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Insurance

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Insurance

Tokyo

Article Abstract:

The underwriting results for Japanese and non-Japanese insurance companies is analyzed, proposed legislation on product liability is debated, and Japan's decision to allow banks to sell insurance is discussed. Japanese non-life insurers underwrote $62.8 billion in premiums compared to foreign insurers who wrote $1.8 billion. Opponents of product liability rules state that production costs and claims will increase while supporters believe consumers need protection. The Japanese Ministry of Finance allows banks to sell insurance products on their own property.

Author: Tanaka, Mitsuo
Publisher: A.M. Best Company, Inc.
Publication Name: Best's Review Property-Casualty Insurance Edition
Subject: Insurance
ISSN: 0005-9714
Year: 1992
Banking industry, Japan, Laws, regulations and rules, Product liability, Products liability, Insurance

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Weighing the costs of standards

Article Abstract:

The risk-based capital standards proposed by the National Assn of Insurance Commissioners may provide only some protection against insolvency. The standards could also lead to major changes in the insurance market. Some insurers could be identified as being undercapitalized, even when they are financially sound. The standards could make some types of risk financing less attractive and cause shortages of certain insurance services. Regulators should evaluate market implications before adopting these standards.

Author: Hefferan, Richard P., Heidrich, Gregory W.
Publisher: A.M. Best Company, Inc.
Publication Name: Best's Review Property-Casualty Insurance Edition
Subject: Insurance
ISSN: 0005-9714
Year: 1992
Professional organizations, Standards, Capital, National Association of Insurance Commissioners

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The 24-hour coverage dilemma

Article Abstract:

Some insurance companies believe that 24-hour coverage would help slow the financial drain caused by workers' compensation claims. Such claims hurt businesses and have cost insurers $11 billion from 1985 to 1993. Critics of 24-hour coverage feel that other cost-containment strategies, such as preferred provider organizations and fee schedules, would be more effective. Additionally, professionals in risk management and human resources still have doubts that 24-hour coverage is a good benefits strategy.

Author: Mangan, Joseph F.
Publisher: A.M. Best Company, Inc.
Publication Name: Best's Review Property-Casualty Insurance Edition
Subject: Insurance
ISSN: 0005-9714
Year: 1993
Workers' compensation

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Finance, Insurance industry
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Technology to go. Melting in the hands of M&M. Melting in the hands of M&M: Johnson & Higgins joins the Marsh & McLennan fold, creating the world's largest insurance brokerage
  • Abstracts: Boarding the IMSA train. The state(s) of the alternative markets. Life reinsurers step forward
  • Abstracts: Changing the rules for discounting. The state(s) of the alternative markets. Paper chase
  • Abstracts: Tracking the path of products. Toward a secure retirement. Keeping the faith on annuities
  • Abstracts: Captivating captives. Alternative directions. High stakes in the alternative market
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.