Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

A 2d Circuit decision analyzes the UCC's 'basis of the bargain' requirement, affirming that actions based on warranties are grounded in contract, not tort

Article Abstract:

The Delaware Supreme Court ruled in Loudon v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. that corporate directors' alleged failure to disclose in a stockholder proxy did not result in impairment of the economic or voting rights of stockholders and thus did not merit damages. In Klang v. Smith's Food & Dryg Centers, Inc.,the same court decided against plaintiff claims that a corporate repurchase of shares violated the legal prohibition against the impairment of capital as well as claims that directors violated their fiduciary duty by not disclosing material information before seeking stockholder approval of a merger.

Author: Brandon, George
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1998
Corporate directors, Disclosure (Securities law), Delaware

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


A 2d Circuit decision analyzes the UCC's 'basis of the bargain' requirement, affirming that actions based on warranties are grounded in contract, not tort

Article Abstract:

The United States Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit ruled in Rogath v. Siebenmann that litigation for breaching an express warranty is based on contract rather than tort. The critical question is thus whether the buyer was purchasing the seller's promise as to the warranty's truth. The question of whether there was indeed a breach of warranty would, the court ruled, have to be decided at trial after evidence on the meaning of the term "challenge" in the art industry.

Author: Brandon, George
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1998
Warranty, Purchasing, Art, Breach of contract

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


7th Circuit streamlines arbitration; a recent federal court decision may limit pre-arbitration litigation and forum-shopping

Article Abstract:

The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals' decision in Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith v Lauer should reduce forum-shopping and pre-arbitration litigation, and improve the arbitration process. The court ruled that Sec 4 of the Federal Arbitration Act limits where motions may be brought when an arbitration's location is predetermined. This does not affect what challenges to an arbitration may be brought, only where they must take place.

Author: Brandon, George
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
Conflict of laws, Jurisdiction, Commercial arbitration, Venue, Venues (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, United States
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: A detailed analysis and reexamination of survivorship insurance use and planning. Helping a client who is charged an extra premium or denied insurance based on health history
  • Abstracts: Lloyd's dodges big bullet on appeal; a ruling that its insurance contracts are subject to SEC regulation is reversed
  • Abstracts: An analysis of changing industrial relations in China. The core principle and fundamental theorem of industrial relations
  • Abstracts: Having made changes to the proposed regulations, the IRS issued final rules affecting the generation-skipping transfer tax
  • Abstracts: Court says exclusion is unclear; the Indiana Supreme Court has held that an 'absolute' pollution exclusion did not bar coverage
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.