Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

A critical assessment of intracorporate loss shifting after prosecutions based on corporate wrongdoing

Article Abstract:

Shareholder or corporate suits initiated to force responsible corporate directors to reimburse the corporation for the expense of previously litigated corporate crimes are economically detrimental and have no deterrent effect on future corporate wrongdoing. Criminal prosecutions of corporations are more desirable than ancillary indemnity actions against directors because it is the corporation that is ultimately responsible for its actions. Plaintiffs seeking additional recovery against individuals in the corporation should be limited to equitable remedies reforming corporate policy.

Author: Werder, Richard I., Jr.
Publisher: Widener University School of Law
Publication Name: Delaware Journal of Corporate Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0364-9490
Year: 1993
Remedies, Criminal liability of juristic persons, Juristic persons criminal liability, Indemnity against liability, Liability indemnity

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Beyond Aronson: recent Delaware cases on demand futility

Article Abstract:

Delaware courts, after the Delaware Supreme Court's 1984 decision in Aronson v. Lewis, have shown a new receptivity to plaintiffs' claims in demand futility cases and other shareholders' derivative actions. Demand futility was proven and demand on the board excused in cases such as Rales v. Blasband, Kahn v. Roberts, Yaw v. Talley, and Kahn v. Tremont Corp. These cases indicate a movement away from rulings routinely favoring corporations to a more equitable means of adjudicating shareholder's actions.

Author: Wilburn, Elizabeth A.
Publisher: Widener University School of Law
Publication Name: Delaware Journal of Corporate Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0364-9490
Year: 1995

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Is statutory compliance the threshold to fair dealing?

Article Abstract:

The Delaware Court of Chancery voided the merger in Jackson v. Turnbull due to numerous violations of the state General Corporation Law, but such drastic actions are rarely needed. The decision may force corporations to strictly comply with Delaware statutory requirements in corporate mergers. However, most mergers will be upheld on equitable principles and decided in favor of the defendants.

Author: Wilburn, Elizabeth A.
Publisher: Widener University School of Law
Publication Name: Delaware Journal of Corporate Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0364-9490
Year: 1995
Acquisitions and mergers, Case Note

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, Laws, regulations and rules, Corporate directors, Stockholders' derivative actions, Shareholder lawsuits, Delaware
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Lethal compassion: conflicting federal court rulings bring assisted-suicide issue to the forefront. ABA House backs affirmative action; at time of national debate, association takes first stand on issue
  • Abstracts: Passive activity losses and their effect on decedents, estates and trusts. Grandparents and gifting: an alternative approach
  • Abstracts: Final reckoning: states allow victims' families to watch executions
  • Abstracts: Ill. workplace monitoring law: friend of Big Brother? Union says eavesdropping law allows bosses to listen in on private conversations. A privacy advocate has doubts
  • Abstracts: Settlements steady at 3.5%. Settlements stable at 3%. Settlements pegged at 3%
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.