Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

A critique of recent opinions of the Federal Circuit in patent interferences

Article Abstract:

The author analyzes the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's opinions, rendered in 1999, on patent interference. Topics covered include corroboration, interference practice, patentability , court review of interference decisions, and post-interference practice.

Author: Gholz, Charles L.
Publisher: Patent and Trademark Office Society
Publication Name: Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0882-9098
Year: 2000
United States, Evaluation

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


A critique of recent opinions of the Federal Circuit in patent interferences

Article Abstract:

Patent interference cases heard by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in 1994 focused on reduction to practice, standards of proof and alternative pleadings, among other issues. In Bosies v. Benedict, the Court confirmed that preponderance of the evidence was the appropriate standard for showing priority. Alternate inventors and dates were allowed to be alleged in Credle v. Bond. The actual reduction to practice standard was softened in Scott v. Finney which involved a penile implant prototype.

Author: Gholz, Charles L.
Publisher: Patent and Trademark Office Society
Publication Name: Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0882-9098
Year: 1995
Analysis, Practice, Patent practice

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


A critique of recent opinions of the Federal Circuit in patent interferences

Article Abstract:

A survey of patent inference cases decided by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in 1995 focuses on reduction to practice, factual questions and patentability. The Court expanded the exception of reduction to practice requirements made available for invention made with no moving parts in In re Asahi/America, Inc. The Court failed to resolve in Molins PLC v. Textron, Inc. what the ethical obligations might be when a practitioner represents two clients that may have interfering applications.

Author: Gholz, Charles L.
Publisher: Patent and Trademark Office Society
Publication Name: Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0882-9098
Year: 1996
Surveys

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Interpretation and construction, Patent law, United States. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: A court revolution brewing? Justices tinker with the federalism trend, but watch out next term. New federalism litmus; rulings, orals show findings by Congress key focus of justices
  • Abstracts: A marriage of convenience: the credit shelter trust and qualified plan and IRA benefits. Avoiding a penalty on early distributions from qualified plans and IRAs
  • Abstracts: The law of unintended consequences: the on sale bar after Pfaff v. Wells Electronics. Patent law; on-sale bar after "Pfaff.'
  • Abstracts: Abortion war reignites; though limited in its range, the latest court attack threatens 'Roe.' Is 'Roe v. Wade' in play? Some fret over Justice Kennedy's remarks in partial-birth ruling
  • Abstracts: A difficult issue returns: the court gets set to hear arguments over gay rights in Colorado case. The constitutional divide; justices venture into thicket of controversial social issues
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.