Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

A procedural focus on unlimited shareholder liability

Article Abstract:

Janet Cooper Alexander argues against implementation of unlimited shareholder liability at the state level due to procedural problems with choice of law and personal jurisdiction. The proposal is that shareholders should be liable on a pro rata basis for tort damages above the corporation's net worth. Federal implementation would be preferable, but the problems at the state level are not as great as Alexander suggests. Choice of law doctrine does not unambiguously favor the state of incorporation over the state in which the tort occurred, and personal jurisdiction could reasonably be asserted.

Author: Hansmann, Henry, Kraakman, Reinier
Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1992
Stockholders, Corporations, Criticism and interpretation, Tort liability, Tort liability of corporations, Alexander, Janet Cooper

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


A self-enforcing model of corporate law

Article Abstract:

Adopting a model of corporate law that is self-enforcing is valuable in emerging nations because foreign capital can be provided some protections without domestic management losing all control. A self-enforcing approach does not rely on the courts but instead builds in procedural safeguards that offer incentives to comply. This model is more effective for newly capitalist nations such as Russia than the enabling model used in developed economies or the prohibitive model evident in the 19th century.

Author: Kraakman, Reinier, Black, Bernard
Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1996
Russia, Economic development, international

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


General principles of company law for transition economies

Article Abstract:

General principles of company law for transition economies were formulated to guide policy makers in the newly independent states, such as those of the former Soviet Union, in making the transition from centrally planned to free market economies. These principles seek to identify the alternative approaches to modern company law and to adapt these approaches to the requirements of each particular country.

Author: Reynolds, Sarah, Black, Bernard, Nestor, Stilpon, Avilov, Gainan, Carreau, Dominique, Kozyr, Oksana M.
Publisher: University of Iowa Journal of Corporation Law
Publication Name: The Journal of Corporation Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0360-795X
Year: 1999
International

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules, Models, Corporation law
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The profession after 15 years. General counsel expanding beyond traditional roles
  • Abstracts: There may come a time ... evolving disability insurance requires careful analysis for proper coverage. Betting against the unexpected: factor in risk potential to determine high or low insurance deductibles
  • Abstracts: Pass-through income to S corporation shareholders not self-employment earnings for Keogh deduction purposes. Patterson v. Shumate & Keogh plans: should the retirement assets of a self-employed individual be included in the individual's bankruptcy estate?
  • Abstracts: Professional responsibilities and attorney liabilities. Shelf registration: past, present and future. Staff legal bulletin no. 7 (September 4, 1998): plain English disclosure
  • Abstracts: Confidentiality agreements become increasingly elusive; several states have limited the availability of protective orders, and judges are now more skeptical about issuing such orders
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.