Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

A public trust exception to the rule of lenity

Article Abstract:

The public trust exception to the rule of lenity should be made explicit so that courts will be able to use the most reasonable construction of an ambiguous statute instead of the most favorable to the defendant in criminal cases involving a public trust. The rule of lenity has a long history as a safeguard for criminal defendants, but courts have often favored less lenient statutory construction when public trust is involved. An explicit exception would promote accountability of public officials and ensure that reasonable interpretations do not have to be disregarded by the courts.

Author: Davies, Ross E.
Publisher: University of Chicago Law School
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 1996
Crime, Criminal law, Public officers, Government officials

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


How clear is "clear"? A lenient interpretation of the Gregory v. Ashcroft clear statement rule

Article Abstract:

State sovereignty is sufficiently protected by a lenient interpretation of the clear statement rule as extended by the US Supreme Court in Gregory v. Ashcroft. The rule requires Congress to state its intentions clearly when regulating state functions. Applying the lenient approach to the Americans with Disabilities Act shows that the law's public services provisions cover state prisoners.

Author: Lee, Michael P.
Publisher: University of Chicago Law School
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 1998
Cases, Federal-state controversies

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


A defense of analogical reasoning in law

Article Abstract:

A defense for using analogical reasoning in law interpretation and legal dispute resolution, based on analogical reasoning's epistemic and institutional advantages, is presented.

Author: Sherwin, Emily
Publisher: University of Chicago Law School
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 1999
United States, Usage, Beliefs, opinions and attitudes, Reasoning, Analogy

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Interpretation and construction, Law
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Making tax law more certain: a theory. High Court rejects an expanded interpretation of section 51 of the Income Tax Assessment Act
  • Abstracts: Yes: unbundling omnibus bills won't work. Translating the letter of the law; court's focus on interpretation brings surprising results in criminal cases
  • Abstracts: Arbitration improves the justice system. The role of arbitration in the field of patent law. Intellectual property disputes: arbitrating the creative
  • Abstracts: The Supreme Court and international law: the demise of Restatement section 403. The President's constitutional authority to use limited military force
  • Abstracts: The quality of medicaid data for HIV/AIDS research: examination of a statewide Data Base. Informed consent to AIDS-vaccine trials in Brazil: a pilot study
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.