Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Actual contamination in the Federal Sentencing Guidelines: to prove or not to prove?

Article Abstract:

Proof of actual contamination should be required before imposing increased sentences for environmental crimes under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. Congress should amend the guidelines to clarify the issue and specify what form of proof is sufficient. Policy arguments for rejecting the requirement based on undue expense, legislative intent, public concern and outcome are not compelling. On the other hand, requiring proof of actual contamination is justified on grounds of due process, fairness, legislative intent, rules of statutory construction, and promotion of the sentencing guideline goals.

Author: Tagliareni, Joan
Publisher: Boston College Law School
Publication Name: Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0190-7034
Year: 1995
Standards, Sentences (Criminal procedure), Burden of proof, Offenses against the environment, Environmental crimes

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Fraud and the duty to disclose off-site land conditions: actual knowledge vs. seller status

Article Abstract:

The New Jersey Supreme Court ruling of Strawn v. Canuso does not go far enough in protecting land purchasers against fraud. Although its expansion of the common law of fraud in land transactions does provide some protection, the professional status standard requiring disclosure only of professional sellers permits knowledgeable laypeople to cheat the unsuspecting. The duty to disclose should not apply only to professionals when average people can pick out issues of materiality.

Author: Kwong, Robert
Publisher: Boston College Law School
Publication Name: Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0190-7034
Year: 1997
House selling, Home selling, Fraud, Vendors and purchasers (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The Federal Advisory Committee Act and its failure to work effectively in the environmental context

Article Abstract:

The Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) has failed in its attempt to cut down on duplication and waste by advisory committees and to open such committees to public oversight. Judicial failure to enforce the law leaves advisory committees no incentive to comply with its requirements. Congress should amend FACA or the courts should give injunctive relief for FACA violations. Such amendment would ensure environmentalists a voice in the adoption of new government policy.

Author: Aurelia, Laurie
Publisher: Boston College Law School
Publication Name: Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0190-7034
Year: 1995
Administrative procedure, Environmental policy

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Across-the-border contamination. The Andorra Power Plant (Teruel): a business ethics case. Worker autonomy and the drama of digital networks in organizations
  • Abstracts: Inclusion of sexual orientation discrimination in the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. Reeves v. Sanderson: United States Supreme Court attempts to clarify plaintiff's burden in 'ADEA' claims
  • Abstracts: Preclusive effect of factual determinations of the International Trade Commission with regard to patent matters
  • Abstracts: Two concepts of mediation in the FmHA's farmer-lender mediation program. Implementation of the children's health insurance program: HHS, states, and lessons for national health reform
  • Abstracts: Judicial devitalization of the WARN Act? The Retirement Protection Act. In search of the summary plan description: judicial conflicts abound
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.