Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Admissibility and discoverability of first-party insurance claim reserves

Article Abstract:

An analysis of relevant cases indicates courts have generally ruled that insurance companies' loss reserves are not discoverable and admissible in first-party insurance claims cases. Such information is not relevant because it does not trigger a duty under a first-party policy. In addition, policyholders could be hurt by the disclosure of a company's loss reserves, since it would inhibit the candid assessment of claims in setting reserves out of fear of compelled discovery in further litigation.

Author: Houser, Douglas G., Gaffney, Aideen M.
Publisher: Federation of Defense and Corporate Counsel
Publication Name: Federation of Insurance & Corporate Counsel Quarterly
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0887-0942
Year: 1998
States, Discovery (Law), Insurance policies, Reserves (Accounting)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Brain mapping: should this controversial evidence be excluded?

Article Abstract:

Brain mapping information should not be allowed to be introduced into evidence to prove brain injuries. Uniformity in testing conditions does not exist and the basis of analysis is not yet developed in the scientific community. The generalized use of such information by plaintiffs' counsel cannot be supported by any judicial standard of proof.

Author: Smagac, Sandra S., Alverson, J. Bruce
Publisher: Federation of Defense and Corporate Counsel
Publication Name: Federation of Insurance & Corporate Counsel Quarterly
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0887-0942
Year: 1998
Evidence, Scientific, Scientific evidence (Law), Brain mapping

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Hedonic damages - methodology and admissibility

Article Abstract:

The authors discuss hedonic damages, their valuation, their appropriateness, and the admissibility of evidence for them.

Author: Smagac, Sandra S., Alverson, J. Bruce
Publisher: Federation of Defense and Corporate Counsel
Publication Name: Federation of Insurance & Corporate Counsel Quarterly
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0887-0942
Year: 2000
Analysis, Quality of life, Valuation, Hedonic damages

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Evidence (Law), Testimony
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Split-use home. Casualty insurance proceeds. Sale to pay divorce settlement not incident to divorce
  • Abstracts: Qualified immunity as a defense to Federal Wiretap Act claims. The justiciability of municipal preemption challenges to state law
  • Abstracts: Directors' negligence liability to creditors: a comparative and critical view. Corporate predecessor liability for defective products
  • Abstracts: Some comments on contributory and induced patent infringement; implications for software developers. Judicial review of PTO patentability": determinations under the substantial evidence standard of review
  • Abstracts: The concept of secondary liability: a conflict between car rental agencies and personal lines insurers. Insurance coverage for "inducement claims"
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.